this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
1072 points (99.0% liked)

People Twitter

8655 readers
312 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 94 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It's clearly not AI because it doesn't have weird uncanny and wonky shit. Also the text on the monitor is readable even though it's blurry

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ai image generators can pretty reliably do text now

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 weeks ago

Not at that scale, they can do larger text fine but at a certain size it just breaks down

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

However, it is cool that she recreated that AI look to trick them.

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's way less recognizable as an AI "art" style to me tbh. Maybe the studio ghibli one? But I haven't really seen art from that one and it even sounds like a stretch

it does look like that AI version of Ghibli. not like Ghibli directly

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly what I thought about the text