this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
762 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

74496 readers
3706 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RiQuY@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Is that even legal? Monopolistic behaviour.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The US Government hasn't given a shit about harmful monopolistic practices in a long time. They only pretend to care from time to time to force large companies to start donating to politicians.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"A long time" would be "Since Trump got back in", since Biden's administration was actually doing a lot to tackle monopolies. They just did a shit job of advertising what they were doing.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right, because the single anti-trust action against Microsoft in the 90s is definitely all that was justified during the rise of the tech giants.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

the biden admin was not in the 90s. look up Lina Khan.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago

Okay? My point is that it's absurd to say that the USFG has been hard on monopolies until Trump's second term.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)