United States | News & Politics

3515 readers

383 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

simsymbiote@midwest.social

Type1@midwest.social

exposingfash@midwest.social

Trump Administration Live Updates: Senate Moves to Vote as Democratic Defectors Relent on Shutdown (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/usa@midwest.social

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(schumer wasn't the defector this time)

what we got:

a provision that would call federal workers who were laid off during the shutdown back to their jobs. It also would provide funds to ensure that federal workers who were furloughed during the shutdown can receive retroactive pay [(the latter as required by a 2019 law defector Angus King passed)].

The short-term spending bill would additionally bar the Office of Management and Budget from implementing any additional mass layoffs of federal workers through Jan. 30.

what we did not:

healthcare

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 48 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The fact that one of the provisions is that the Republicans will follow existing law by paying furloughed staff is a massive red flag even if everything else is ignored.

Good job trading something already required for everyone else's healthcare Schumer!

[–] feddylemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Schumer said he will vote against the deal. The defectors are to blame here.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

These Senators aren't going to break ranks like that without getting the nod from leadership. Schumer took a big hit the first time he folded, so this time he just wanted cover. It's still his failure.

[–] feddylemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

All I can say is at the end of the day, the right needed yes votes. And the ones who voted yes are to blame. You can assume about Schumer. I'll leave that to the apparent mind readers.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Schumer caved in the spring.

Schumer started the negotiating last week by offering a milquetoast request to have a vote for one fucking year extension instead of making it permanent. These fucks who are committed are just doubling down on his shitty compromising and it absolutely looks like he is just trying to save face.

[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That fact that every defector is retiring or otherwise bot up for re-election is a HUGE clue that this is orchestrated, in order to minimize fallout. Schumer is avsolutely to blame here.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

or it could be that not being up for re-election increases the chances of voting to reopen because they are not beholden to the electorate anymore. ergo propter hoc, anyone?

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, that would require them to want to screw over the populace.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

politicians can simultaneously believe that a course of action is best and that the people wouldn't vote for it