this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
416 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

74873 readers
3023 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

3% may not sound much but this is on revenue, not profit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This just sounds like higher VAT on large tech companies? Isn’t it a regressive tax?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Generally (for most countries that do this, I haven't researched Poland) the point is that traditional (non-digital) companies have always paid import duties, usually much higher than 3%, when goods are physically imported. Digital goods by their nature have effectively been skirting the system for a few decades and paying zero tax, and it's not good for local businesses to be in a situation where they're paying a bunch of taxes locally but foreign businesses competing in the same market get to just skip it.

The $750M requirement is likely because the amount of paperwork required for a small business to correctly calculate, process and pay that tax would be prohibitively expensive for them to sell their service to Polish customers, and they don't want a situation where small businesses just straight up refuse to sell in Poland.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly this. The whole premise of the tax system is based around the historically correct idea that you need to physically move goods in order to sell them, or physically be somewhere to sell services.

Companies like google are making buckets of money all over the world, and don't need to tax a dime most places, because they have no physical presence there. This makes it pretty much impossible to compete with the international behemoths, because they have access to a munch of tax-free revenue, while a startup will typically be centred around wherever they're based, where they also need to pay taxes.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Not to mention that they say they don't have to abide by local laws because they aren't located there.