this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
421 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
2625 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
421
Devs gripe about having AI shoved down their throats (www.theregister.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And as per usual, those hating AI the most are the ones who don’t use it, don’t understand it, and/or hate it out of some misguided ideology.

I'm a software engineer and I use AI on a regular basis.

This shit isn't fit to take on the vast majority of jobs dipshit CEOs or the pseudointellectuals who fondle their balls claim they can.

Imitative is fine, great even in software development.

Fine as a tool for software engineers to figure out complications with understanding code syntax or generating an example of some not so complicated code.

It is fucking unreliable for full software development, which is what these tech oligarchs are trying to put it in charge of.

You don’t need to reinvent the wheel. Programming languages/class libraries/etc all exist to give standard and functioning ways to do things the way they’re supposed to be done.

And AI is shit at making full implementations of that, let alone objectively or even rationally testing itself. If it doesn't recognize an error in its own coding, why the hell would we trust it to recognize that error in testing?

It’s funny that developers the world over absolutely loved and embraced tools like resharper, which was basically AI 0.5 for devs, yet now when AI is the evolution of that, everyone’s losing their mind.

Because dumb fucks in power think AI is this magical tool that can do no wrong and do everything humans can do and better.

We are FAR AWAY from that being a reality for the reasons I already covered, and more.

Also, absolutely no company worth a damn has ever pushed anything from Resharper or AI to its millions of customers without human verification first. CEOS WANT TO ELIMINATE THAT HUMAN VERIFICATION! THATS A PROBLEM!

Knowledge of AI tools absolutely will and should be a part of developer competencies that are evaluated during interviews in the near future, and that includes being able to explain why and when you would/would not use specific AI tools.

Except, and I want you to pay close attention to this,

CEOS WANT TO TOTALLY ELIMINATE THE HUMAN FACTOR FROM SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ENTIRELY

Not partially

Not kinda sorta

ENTIRELY

Because they simply fundamentally do not understand what AI is, nor it's restrictions.

And it's very clear, you don't either.