this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
395 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
1845 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
395
The Supreme Court Is About to Hear a Case That Could Rewrite Internet Access (slate.com)
submitted 1 week ago by RegularJoe@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"Imagine losing internet access because someone in your household downloaded pirated music."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prox@lemmy.world 110 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm gonna go to businesses I don't like, hop on the Wi-Fi, and pirate from all the most obvious trackers.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Selective enforcement.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 32 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Great sentiment but we all know a business will get a pass for this just like when Meta got busted torrenting all those books and were told its okay because they're using it to train their AI.

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago

only one way to find out!

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is that the conclusion? I thought that's still under investigation. I remember reading about it months after the first reports.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 days ago

It intentionally got buried in legal, it's likely going to take 10 years and end up as a settlement out of court

[–] ChaosSpectre@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This seems like the best strategy realistically. If scotus makes it everyones problem, then make it a problem for those with the most to lose from losing internet access.

Starbucks in particular would have a bad time lol

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They wouldn't though, large businesses see no consequences from laws that you and I would see consequences for.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Then you get your pirated content with no worry, for once I seethis as a win win!

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Naw, they will figure out how to target you specifically.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, then it just becomes a defacto situation of the content creation companies (Disney, Sony, etc) owning the telecom companies. So you will truly be a single content household, like a Disney Household or a Paramount Household.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

... And Sean Kennedy's listener licence becomes just a little closer to reality.

(I know that no one knows who that is, but Tales From the Afternoon was ironically prophetic and well ahead of it's time. Unfortunately I'm one of a very few people who knows who he is lol)