this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
74 points (72.3% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
2625 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
74
[Opinion] AI finds errors in 90% of Wikipedia's best articles (en.wikipedia.org)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by King@blackneon.net to c/technology@lemmy.world
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

For one month beginning on October 5, I ran an experiment: Every day, I asked ChatGPT 5 (more precisely, its "Extended Thinking" version) to find an error in "Today's featured article". In 28 of these 31 featured articles (90%), ChatGPT identified what I considered a valid error, often several. I have so far corrected 35 such errors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Just wanted to point out the insane disparity between the cost of running Wikipedia and that of ChatGPT. The question here is not if LLMs are useful for some things, rather than if it's worth it for most things.