this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
286 points (99.7% liked)

Funny

12543 readers
929 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Empricorn@feddit.nl 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Relax. I'm allowed to state my opinion, you're allowed to disagree. If we're still not on the same wavelength, it's fine, but we don't need to make it a big thing.

I have never in my life seen people crop part of their own image out of the the post they themselves chose to post so no, Occam's razor does apply. But again, you're allowed to disagree. But wherever you got the image from, it was edited, that's a fact...

[โ€“] Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm allowed to state my opinion

It was edited, that's a fact

It was a photograph taken focusing on the center of a security banner. It was not edited or cropped after the fact, it was merely taken from a close range focusing on the images. How this has sailed 35,000 feet over your head I have no idea. But this entire comment chain has been nonsensical from start to finish on your part. Because no. Occam's Razor does not apply to a situation this not occurring. You have invented a chain of events that has never happened, insisted that things were edited when they were not. This is an utter waste of time.

Have fun with that.

Edit: apologies on the double comment. Instance issues.