this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
439 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

74902 readers
2139 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/36925956

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.zip 37 points 2 days ago (20 children)

Is there a "torrenting for absolute tech illiterate morons" guide out there?

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

i personally use a provider for that. i just download torrents to their cloud and get it at maximum speed from there. so I don't have to worry about p2p risks or being online a lot. I'm with premiumize, but there are others I guess.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is those companies (premiumize, debrid, whatever) are entities that make profits from filesharing and give nothing back to artists. That's not morally defensible.

Filesharing itself is perfectly morally defensible, and in fact sharing culture is good for society (including artists).

So while they might be convenient, they also shouldn't exist in the first place. Parasitic companies shouldn't be rewarded for their patristic behaviour.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

you are not wrong, but this also applies to VPN services. (their defense is as good as the sharehosters are useful for downloading Linux ISOs) and without using any of those proxy services, the lawyers get rich on my money, not the artists either

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

VPNs would still be in business if illegal filesharing didn't exist. I don't think you could say the same for sharehosters.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 20 hours ago

true. because they scam people into thinking they would add privacy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)