that dude looks like a movie villain.
Flippanarchy
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
He does have a little Ray Liotta look to him.
Fuck 'em. They wanna spy on everyone else.
Yeah there's no obligation to decorum or fair play here. I think maybe its mate's image would also be a perfectly fair perfectly lovely thing to post.
I'm not too upset about including its spawn, but I get the argument for cropping them out.
I'm not at all upset, the same courtesy is not extended to us. Fuck 'em. Its about time we start getting dirty or die. Mother Nature ain't gonna wait around too much longer before she cans this run and starts again.
I will always maintain that assassinating well-known or infamous figureheads is a worthless strategem. At best, it's merely symbolic, at worst it's likely to backfire spectacularly - and it achieves very little in reality because you're not actually doing any structural damage to the hierarchy involved.
Their right-hand henchmen, the people these figureheads rely on to get anything done and usually remain hidden in the shadows, on the other hand...
In theory you are right yet history has shown dramatic political progress after assassinations.
UnitedHealthcare immediately changed their policies after the assassination.
yet history has shown dramatic political progress after assassinations.
History shows that poorly-thought out assassination attempts backfire far more than they succeed at achieving anything good. I can point at assassinations like Dmitri Tsafendas (an anarchist) stabbing Hendrik Verwoerd as an attempt that achieved absolutely nothing, and at Alexander Berkman (another anarchist) shooting Henry Clay Frick as an attempt that backfired disasterously on anarchists at the time.
Brian Thompson's assassination should be an important case study for radicals when it comes to the use of targeted lethal force. For one, Thompson was an unknown - not a well-known personality like (for instance) Charlie Kirk. Second, Mangione's motives was not overtly political - a very important factor in his subsequent lionisation. This is why Thompson's demise could not be used as political theatre by liberals and fascists in the way that they used Kirk's.
(I am aware that Kirk wasn't assassinated by a leftist, but that's neither here nor there when it comes to this question)
What do you mean by "not overtly political"? I feel like I disagree with you on that point, but I suspect that might be because I'm not understanding your meaning here
What do you mean by “not overtly political”?
Mangione's grievance with Big Healthcare was seen as personal - ie, he didn't make any attempt to justify it with an overtly political narrative that could only be seen as abstract by the general public.
Leftists forget that the general public does not conflate the personal with the political. That is why the general public lionised Luigi Mangione and completely ignored Aaron Bushnell.
It is not a trivial thing, unfortunately.
R.I.P. Aaron Bushnell, Free Palestine
What policies?
I will always maintain that assassinating well-known or infamous figureheads is a worthless strategem. At best, it's merely symbolic, at worst it's likely to backfire spectacularly - and it achieves very little in reality because you're not actually doing any structural damage to the hierarchy involved.
we have about a thousand years of history showing you're right
Re-posted since LW removed it…
Any idea why?
My impression is lemmy-world is pretty conservative. Not in a maga-hat "kill the queers" way, but in the "respectable" "don't rock the boat even if people are drowning" kind of way.
My impression is lemmy-world is pretty conservative.
Ie, liberal.
I would guess that it was for “doxxing” even though every bit of information provided is public record.
Don't you dare post public info about the people who actively want to kill you and your family! That makes you as bad as the rich assholes who would kill you themselves if they could.
That's why. .world protects fascists.
I actually hope it's just that. Remember that powerful people who try to hide their identities, will wield their power. Let's hope we don't become a target.
They're doing a bad job hiding it when it's public info you can find on google in a few seconds. But we won't, they're too busy being fascist dickwads to care about us.
Could be considered doxxing though there is no specific call to harass.
It absolutely couldnt and no sane legal scholar would say otherwise.
What is Stochastic Terrorism, Trebek
That being said, I have no issues with this.
Its not stochastic terrorism. Were not calling him a pedophile or a vampire. Nobody's calling for him to be killed. We're just Annoying him with our eyes.
Fox news has done worse literally every single day since 2008, and the fcc, back when that existed, never gave a single fuck.
Posting a person's address, picture, full name, and a list of personal faults that is supported by evidence which would likely cause people to reach out and contact the person over their actions.
Doxxing is "posting private or identifying information about an individual without the person's consent, usually with malicious intent".
So yeah, without the intent but it could be considered doxxing.
Unless you have some actual evidence or a counter argument to make instead of "nuh uh"?
I just think it's important for folks to know they have a fascist living in their community, similar to how a pedophile register works. For the record, I don't wish any physical harm to come to him. I just think its important to expose and keep an eye on fascists who do wish harm on whole swathes of society. Much as fascists don't give a damn about the privacy of regular citizens who might oppose their plans (e.g. ICE using Flock cameras for domestic surveillance, or basically anything the NSA does), I don't see why rich fascists should get special consideration wrt their privacy, especially when it comes to publicly available info like court records.
Oh I don't disagree, I just didn't want you to get deleted over doxxing. That's why I made the comment, and if you notice in no part was it against the action or critical of being open about these shits who abuse our systems.
Does he hate it because of privacy reasons or because he has a butt where his chin should be?
Whatever it is, every single hair follicle on his head is pointing away from it. Could be signs there is a butthole nestled between the cheeks?
I’m trying to figure out if that’s his natural chin it he got chin implants lol
The man who knows where the bodies are buried.
He looks like a straight-up hitman.
He looks like a real life Terminator; no offense meant towards Robert Patrick, who is the exact opposite of that prick.
If I remember correctly I think I read he also manages all of Musks baby mamas. He hands out the funds and enforces the ndas
Fucking love this new shit.
They really shouldnt scrutinize if they don't want to be scrutinized
They didn't and don't obey the spirit of law, or worry about how what they do effects others, other peoples feelings, or even obey the actual fucking law itself if they don't think they have to
So I dont believe that overthinking these things is necessary when considering what to do about the people themselves or the problems that are created as a result.
This isn't to say don't obey the law but is def to say not to worry about how it might appear to some instead of how it actually is
Resisting within the confines of the system when you can makes good sense, and this is that in fucking SPADES duder
Bravo whoever you are, and thank you
They make every device we own spy on us in our own homes but don't want us to know anything about their life. Fuck these psychopaths asshats.
Ancestry seems to have some very promising hints for additional information. It seems to be an uncommon name.
Gonna need an address. K THANX BYE.
16715 Destiny Cove, Austin, TX 78738-7421
30 minutes from Elon's house: 109 Stratford Reserve Pl, West Lake Hills, TX 78746
These fucks deserve zero privacy.
He looks like he would have been pals with Epstein.