this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
286 points (98.0% liked)

Fuck AI

4728 readers
695 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EgoNo4@lemmy.world 105 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Billions of dollars poured into AI for... Nudes. The stupidity of humanity has no boundaries...

[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago

Techbros trying desperately to solve the very real problem of them not getting any through removing that little obstacle in their way: consent.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One of the first pieces of recorded video was porn. New same as the old.

[–] EgoNo4@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I'm fairly certain that one was consensul though.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I fully understand this girl and I wish her well but this is a genie that left a bottle that it will never again get back in to, I'm afraid

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Push it on to credit card processors, webhost operators, domain registrars etc proceeds of crime.

Edit: they are getting money from somewhere to run the computers these models run on.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There is no way back on that.

I can run these models on my local machine. It's not even a complex model.

This lawsuit is targeting the profiteers because that's the only reasonable recourse for an individual.

The criminal side of things is something a prosecutor needs to handle. Making this a priority becomes a political situation because it requires specific resources.

[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe we need to start pointing out it didn't make people naked, it just fits a naked body it saw in training under the person's head. It's Photoshop but faster.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Not exactly. Head swaps have been a thing for a while.

These models match the body shape. They are essentially peeling back the layers of clothing. The thinner those layers the more accurate it can be.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right, and the people disseminating and hosting the tools tailored to criminal harassment should be held accountable, and the people hosting the resulting images. All of these people have their own revenue that can and should be disrupted.

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they’re not really tailored to that… also, it wasn’t hard to photoshop naked pictures that long ago.
but now these “tools” are neural net models… there are thousands of them hosted on dozens of source code repositories… and like op said, you can run it on any high end gaming gpu.
you can’t outlaw source code like that.
you could sue this one app maker and try to require that they prove consent and detect underage photos… totally a good idea, but it would do little to stop it…
they’ll just use a different app
i think they could prosecute the other people making and distributing the pictures though.

[–] DonPiano@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can easily get a rock from the woods, but if I use one to break someone's fingers, I should be prosecuted.

Except yeah, in this case we should go after the entire chain: AI trainers, hosters, users and their supplementary industries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don’t want credit card processor being the judge of what I can spend my money on or domain registrars being the judge of what websites I can visit.

The person who did a crime should be taken to court and all the intermediaries should have the excuse of being neutral.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We can push this so far underground that the only people who use this are 4chan creeps on the dark web, we cant destroy AI but we can push it to the fringes

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

It's like cleaning: You'll never get your space 100% spotless, and trying it will yield diminishing returns. Thus, the aim is to do "good enough" for the given context (an operating theatre may have higher standards than a storage room in your basement, for instance).

Likewise, pushing harmful things to the fringes has to be "good enough".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago (7 children)

There ought to be a legal fund for these deepfake lawsuits so we can sue every one of these scummy companies out of existence. I'd donate to it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

If chat control was supposed to save the children then why is this still alive?

It was never about the children

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This new tech means we need to get over nudity and what even is real vs fake in all media. Causing harm due to bodies, let alone fake ones is a societal and cultural failure.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is why futurama and starship troopers both have mixed showers

[–] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

No, Fry, you're just in the women's shower.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 week ago

Is this some covert advertising for nudify? I wonder how much search activity for it increased with these articles.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Okay, I'm not in pro, nor opposed to fake nudes. But let's think about why they exist. We want to see people naked having sex. Its a type of entertainment and the performers are real live actors. That industry will collapse as we know it if AI takes over. Either that or Nabisco will add sex pictures on their chocolate wrappers because porn stars will just be another naked person having sex for a few bucks.

I for one really would like normal people having sex for my entertainment. If we let AI get the best of ourselves, porn will be, one day soon, gone forever! Muscle guys will forget how to pose together with another five guys so we can still see their penises going in and out of the actresses vagina. The actresses will not known how to prepare mentally and physically to be stretched in such an extreme way. That requires years of practice. I'm only half joking, it definitely takes some time to stretch out the various orifices in such a way.

I propose to only watch non-AI porn, because that's the only way to preserve our culture. That's the only way to keep the actors practicing their moves, the actresses practicing their orgasms and the talent acquisition team hard at work! They need to keep those audition couches filled and warm! And what about the support teams?

The camera guys need to remember the traditional ways of getting out of the ways of the balls swinging. The make-up girls, the fluffers, the microphone guy, the language translation teams and the special effects guy all need jobs! I mean...waka waka waka, 70's style music doesn't write itself! And the cleanup crue? They need the job! And they are ready with brushes, brooms, spatula, water buckets, stain removers, etc. And the furniture guys? Selling the odd couch or bed at consignment. Same for the dressing teams.

Its an industry we must keep supporting. Porn is us, porn is human. Thank you!

I'll take my check when you guys are done fondling each other.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›