Do people realize how much drugs are brought into the US everyday? These small boats wouldn't even be able to supply a small city. This is a complete joke. War on Drugs theatre.
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
430 points (98.9% liked)
politics
26650 readers
1854 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Well they are claiming it's Fentanyl, which is obviously a lie... But if it were then even just 1 kilo could fuel a city for a while. Assuming a 2mg dose, which is literally overkill for people without a tolerance, you would get 500K doses.
This is why the war on drugs is completely lost now. Any person could smuggle like 10G in their butt or shoe and would have like 5000 doses, equivalent of like 25k minimum street value. None of this coming by speedboat, it's too easy to just hide in commerce.
A rough estimate for cocaine use alone would be anywhere from 4,000-12,000 pounds a day for illicit US use. It is a staggering amount of drugs that need to be made or imported for US citizens.
They also need to send several more times than this to keep supply flowing because of interdiction, waste, and shrinkage. So we are talking about 100,000-250,000 pounds of all illicit drugs every single day.
The War On Drugs was unbelievable success for it's true intentions. A lot of people don't understand that it was really a war on minorities. At best it was a political tool to suppress the public and at worst it was a multigenerational genocide.
Instead of giving people the hope and tools for a better future, our government used it to strip our rights, normalize police militarization, destroys countless families, and let people die from overdoses needlessly.
The loss of life is staggering. The dramatic drop in quality of life is mind boggling. The reparations the government would owe if this reality would reach the masses would be easily a hundred trillion dollars if you also count the destruction in Mexico and South America.
Instead of helping vulnerable people they instead decided to let the Sacklers and Eli-Lillys promote hardcore opiates to doctors and patients while claiming they were safe and harmless; feeding the very same drug war machine that leads to a presumably innocent boat to be blasted out of the water and finished off an entire hour later.
It's rotten to the core.
Do you have some sources for your data? Not that I don't believe you, it's just really hard to find drug statistics without wading through pages and pages of drug recovery program links in a Google search.
I did some basic research and made some assumptions. 1-2 million cocaine users that self identify. More likely 10-20 million users with a lot of those being casual take it or leave it users. Probably just under a million chronic users.
So let's just say about million grams a day over a million users. That is about two tons. I think this is probably an underestimate, honestly.
Obviously my methodology is not great, just rough guesses based upon the best information.
Don't try to prompt critical thinking in the US with your facts. If those citizens could read, they would be very upset.
We are all upset but ww have no political mechanism in place that gives the people a voice in government.
Oh, the senate and house of gerrymandered districts? That represents the people who gerrymandered the districts. The president? He represents the randos who pick him the "electoral college". And he has dementia. The judicial? They just want a big boat or their religious views to be the ones we follow, they represent themselves.
I feel like "we the people" should vote daily by phone so we could actually have a voice. Who should see the votes? Everyone. Us, them, the world.
If the idiots in charge destroy a boat and the people's vote immediately turns negative, then they should not do that. If we go to war and our vote is positive, then yeah let's keep going to war.
This reminds me of the Ludlow Amendment.
I'll have to read up on that.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Okay but... even if it was, who the fuck are we to unilaterally make the decision to execute them?
I'd wager the largest contributors to preventable deaths in the US (outside of maybe cholesterol-induced cardiovascular disease) are cigarettes and alcohol, so at best these strikes would be the equivalent of blowing up the trucks delivering the products to distribution centers.
At worst - and what we seem to be doing now - we are indiscriminately annihilating any vehicles that are in the general vicinity of the distilleries.
There have been rum runners, cigar runners, drug runners, all because of prohibition.
Seems like maybe it's the prohibition part that's the problem
Since when has being wrong ever prevented the US military from acting?
Certainly not since the Gulf of Tolkien
You mean Operation Enduring Ent?
I think this one is Operation Túrin's Bain, the one with the big, stinky dragon
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
The USA now has death penalty just for being suspected of a crime without evidence.
USA is a rogue nation.
Did you forget decades of drone strikes with highlights such as blowing up a civilian wedding?
You are not wrong, just a couple hundred years late to the party.
It's quite obvious by now that the US military will not decline following illegal orders. That's what led to most atrocities committed by German troops in WW2. The free world must get ready to ally and invade the US to prevent further escalation.
I wouldn't say it is obvious they won't decline. This particular event could sway it significantly. If they end up throwing the admiral under the bus, I would bet people would think more about illegal orders in the future.
Does that seem likely to you? I guess it depends on the outcome of the probes by both congress and senate, but it doesn't seem likely to me that anything will come out of them. If even it did, he would still have to be found guilty by a military court I think. Unless all the strikes are declared illegal due to the US not being at war in which case it could go to a civil court, as far as I understand. That would mean the administration admits that the whole campaign had no legal ground though, which I don't see happening. Plus the supreme court seemingly being completely corrupted as well..
Obviously what I wrote above is completely impossible, there's no way to invade the US. And by free world I certainly don't mean Russia or China either, so no chance. This can only be resolved from within the US. I hope it will, but at the moment it looks grim.
load more comments
(6 replies)
These boats would have had to refuel multiple times during the trip, this has been obvious all along
Imagine actually being surprised by this
The people who think it was smuggling drugs are the people who think ICE is only going after people who break the law
load more comments
(24 replies)
Aren't these all small boats anyway? Like boats that are too small to carry that much fuel? I thought this was established already.
Something gives me the impression that Trump thinks extra-judicial is a type of bubblegum.
I don't think they ever claimed it was heading for US. The first time I heard about it it was claimed it was heading for some island.
view more: next ›