this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
741 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

74966 readers
2792 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This consolidation of power is a dream come true for the Big Tech platforms, but it’s a nightmare for users. While the megacorporations get more traffic and a whole lot more user data (read: profit), users are left with far fewer community options and a bland, corporate surveillance machine instead of a vibrant public sphere. The internet we all fell in love with is a diverse and colorful place, full of innovation, connection, and unique opportunities for self-expression. That internet—our internet—is worth defending.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 days ago

Amazes me how the UK Labour Party and Starmer managed to absolutely squander their one opportunity after gaining power for the first time in many years.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

i find it interesting that some of the most debased, vile, disgusting perverts to ever live are passing laws to force regular, everyday people to dox themselves just so they can see a tig ol gilf bitty.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago

In the cat and mouse game, sex always wins. Nudity will, uh, find a way.

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 185 points 4 days ago (55 children)

If I have to verify myself I simply won't use it, I really don't care, there's nothing so important online that I need to prove my identity to see it. (Banking and shit like that aside of course). Social media? Give me a break I'm already over it before all this ID shit. I hope it all burns to the ground.

Yup, the furthest I'd go is entering a birthdate. Depending on the service, I'm anywhere from 21 to 105 years old.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 48 points 4 days ago (1 children)

this. I refuse to make more accounts, and verify personal info. Ive been prepping for the big disconnect from the internet as a result. there will come a time when it just won't be usable

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 days ago

Tor and i2p say hello. The internet itself will be totally usable. The clear net is what will become unusable.

load more comments (53 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 87 points 4 days ago (21 children)

Absolutely never using any service that requires this. I dont even have any account on those platforms and I never will.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 days ago

I completely agree. The minute a platform asks me to do age verification is the moment I leave that platform.

I will take my traffic to platforms that won't do shit like that.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] littleguy@lemmy.cif.su 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Remember to always host anonymously.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

Share some tips for that?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Depends on the platform surely, couldn't a lemmy instance just ignore the UK? Not block, ignore.

I am sure I saw that smaller platforms are seeing a surge in popularity because they are not doing it while pornhub saw a large drop. How many switched to a VPN and how many use another site?

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Even safer might be that image that's been circulating. It states that if you're in the UK, the hosting site is required to verify your age, but they're not required to verify your location. Now, please click on of these buttons indicating whether or not you're in the UK to determine whether age verification must be performed.

(Presumably "I am in the UK" leads to an innocuous website)

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I'd prefer: "I'm in the UK and want to be age verified" and "I'm not in the UK and don't want to be age verified."

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What if devices would have a private chip to have the ID, so the website would just request if user is underage or not. Would this be private? Instead of sending the whole id to the online platform?

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Some kind of anonymous token that says "I'm adult" and smart card on credit cards are kind of that, but they have a unique identifier that identifies you. They're not anonymous which is the only acceptable kind of adult verification. It makes more sense to cordon off all parts of the internet with identity/age verification and consider them destroyed. I'd like to have an IP banlist of all participants in his harebrained scheme, just rip off the bandair immediately rather than have them shit the bed down the line.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Hopefully, in the EU at least, the verification will be provided by the government. Like a 2FA, meaning Big Tech would only get a verified token and nothing else.

The government already got passports with our face, and have had it for many years. They could use that information.

That would mean that any platform could implement this verification, and never get hold on any data.

Best case in a shitty scenario, I know.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No. There's no "hopefully" anything when it comes to this bullshit. It's bad for the individual, full stop. This is not a thing to compromise on, because any compromise at all will eventually harm the users (though leaks/hacks, or government overreach, etc.) without any actual benefit or offset to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

one of the big problems that isn't solved by this is what gets to be behind verification. who decides what kids aren't allowed to see. we've seen already that most of the world's governments can't really be trusted with what is adult content and not.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 4 days ago (8 children)

When I was in highschool my friends parents had child lock bullshit on his computer, poor sod couldn't even goto wikipedia because there are articles with naughty words.

This shit is real slippery slope shit.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›