this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
177 points (98.9% liked)

politics

25887 readers
2743 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 114 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"His crusade is far more about fighting gerrymandering than party preferences."

Complete blatant outright utter lie. If he gave a tiny shit about gerrymandering he would ahve fought Texas, more than just "criticize" them. Sanewash the Nazis some more whydontcha.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I was thinking about this recently, but it's actually shocking that our country isn't already far more gerrymandered than it is. Because there are very few laws against gerrymandering, and so, since the average politician has no conscience, there's really nothing stopping them from gerrymandering as much as possible.

That's the current rules we're playing with.

To use a sports analogy, it's like in basketball, everybody knows that fouling the winning team at the last minute can be a way to catch up, especially if the person being fouled is bad at free throws. So that's why the losing team always starts fouling at the end of a close game, even though it seems like a sort of a cheap tactic.

But in the case of gerrymandering, it's like everybody knows fouling is the way to win, and almost nobody is actually doing it. It's hard to imagine.

And to continue the basketball analogy, if you wanted them to stop fouling at the end of the game, you could fix it by changing the rules for the next season. You can't just rely on the goodwill of the teams to stop doing it. Similarly, we can fix gerrymandering through either federal laws or constitutional amendments.

[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I think you're quite underestimating the extent of gerrymandering. The reason they haven't gone all out prior is out of 2 core reasons;fear voters would vote against them if they do and fear the other party would retaliate with similar measures. Option one is obviously been found to not be an issue, and now that they think they can seize permanent power with it, option 2 is also starting to be ignored by Republicans --but the dems are following through with the ever present implicit threat

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

We need a 100% wealth tax on everything over $200,000,000.

We will give you a medal stating that you won capitalism and then it is time to move on to a different hobby.

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Because wealth over that value does little to improve your quality of life (actually far less than that, but this is a generous cap).

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

I wish we lived in a world where people were arguing where the 100% tax kicks in, if it's at 100 mil or 200 mil, etc. If that was our most divisive issue we would all have 4-day workweeks, guaranteed universal basic income, and maybe even dental care we can afford.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Also depending on how you calculate that it'd basically be the amount a machine shop or small factory is worth.

[–] Periodicchair@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Hopefully the rest is owned by the workers of that factory. Zero tax then.

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

And what does what you wrote have to do with the specific number OP wrote?

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago

Try $10 million

[–] akincisor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

It should be a multiple of minimum wage. Also we should have a maximum wage as a multiple of minimum wage. Tying them together will give the rich some incentive to raise the minimum wage

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago

Munger is a Republican, but his crusade is far more about fighting gerrymandering than party preferences.

Interesting that we're not hearing about him pouring his vast wealth into opposing the heinous gerrymandering in Texas and other red states.

[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

US is a sham democracy, an oligarchy ruled by the rich much like banana republics. Citizens are nothing but subjects swaying to the whims of the rich.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago

For real, we outnumber them by a lot too and need to remember that

[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago

How long until news breaks exposing him as a pedophile?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

They're not Newsom's plans, they're the plans of low level state politicians in Cali who put the work in and made this happen.

Don't let some shitbird transphobe take their credit.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

If I’ve gotten a single one of those ads I’ve tuned it out. I do get a ton of pro-prop 50 ones though.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Let him waste his money. It’s a done deal.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

Probably Asshole Berkshire.