this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
113 points (88.4% liked)

Technology

74994 readers
2911 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

We left this month, wife is moving to YouTube premium as a way to ease her out of straming services and I'm building our collection of music every month through self-hosting so when she's ready there's a large library for her.

It's been great buying music from artists and listening to whole albums which is not something I normally do.

Spotify doesn't support their artists as far as I'm aware, what money they do spend on creators it's people like Joe Rogan, and they continue to increase the price every month. I'm tired of paying for techno fascist's next Yacht (or election) and this is just one way we're slowly pulling away from subscriptions.

[–] simsalabim@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They still scam artists and support war drone manufacturers.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

Im not against supporting war drone manufacturers so much as ones related to Israel.

I'd buy multiple subscriptions if the proceeds went to Ukrainian drones.

[–] sma3in@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I think they saw that their premium users are now cancelling their subscription and moving to other streaming services, also bands like KGATLW is removing their catalogue from there, so they pulled this move. Not until Spotify start paying artists fairly, moderate the AI music bullshit, stop jacking up the prices, stops supporting the genocide against Palestine, improve their discovery algorithm and the list goes on; Spotify can go fuck itself

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

99% of people are going to use Bluetooth headphones but insist they hear the difference.

[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

This will soon no longer be a gatekeeper, with 6.1 at most 6.2 we will have the high actual available bandwidth for Hi-Res, latency will still be around but quality will finally be on par with low-mid Hi-Res.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 hours ago

And they still exploit artists

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I've been meaning to look back into spotizerr and now I'm curious if it'll give me lossless.

[–] ncrav@lemmings.world 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

You're like 10 years late to the party pals: qobuz, deezer, tidal, ...

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 12 hours ago

So you can hear their ai slop music more clearly.

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 76 points 23 hours ago (24 children)

Gotta say I'm surprised to see Spotify adding something people actually want. It must be getting rough for them.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Master@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I failed the npr test so I dont think I need it. Either im to old or use shitty Bluetooth headphones... Or both!

[–] eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

If other people want to try:

NPR test

ABX test

[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Bluetooth protocol uses AAC to compress audio. If you use lossless audio with Bluetooth headphones it’ll sound the same because either way you’re always listening to compressed audio

[–] eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

It depends, some better Bluetooth headphones (like the Sony WH-1000XM family) support protocols other than SBC, which have a lot higher bandwidth.

[–] Master@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

To be fair I also tried the test with some 250 dollar monitor headphones and failed too. Probably because the shitty onboard sound card. But also im old.

[–] BakedCookie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 hours ago

Not universally true, mine uses aptx. Depending on the device you can switch between codecs.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu -5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There is no such thing as lossless audio. 44kHz is bad

[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

44.1 is the LOWEST Hi-Res its just CD quality, literally.

After we got proof of Tidal lying about lossless I had to lock in Qobuz for the foreseeable future. 2nd year already and rarely ever I don't find artists or albums. Deezer was alright for the 5 years I had my account but I could still notice harsh highs on some symphonies and dull-ish Jazz sessions, not my main genres but I'm still glad I made the switch

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 points 3 hours ago

Why do people upvote you and downvote me though we say the same thing

[–] br0da@lemmy.world 23 points 23 hours ago

Fuck Spotify

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Are they going to switch to a reward system that doesn't allow botfarms to steal money from legitimate artists?

No?

That would reduces apparent user volume?

Oh noo...

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cool, I'll still be using Tidal, as they pay their artists the most, I believe.

[–] Mora@pawb.social 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

According to https://www.soundguys.com/tidal-vs-qobuz-140740/ this is not the case.

Qobuz $0.022
Napster $0.02
Tidal $0.013
Apple Music $0.01
Deezer $0.0064
Spotify $0.003 - $0.005
Amazon Music $0.00402
SoundCloud $0.0025 - $0.004
Pandora $0.00133
YouTube Music $0.00069 - $0.0012
[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 23 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Same table aligned to cents for easier reading.

Qobuz 2.2¢
Napster 2.0¢
Tidal 1.3¢
Apple Music 1.0¢
Deezer 0.640¢
Spotify 0.300¢ - 0.500¢
Amazon Music 0.402¢
SoundCloud 0.250¢ - 0.400¢
Pandora 0.133¢
YouTube Music 0.069¢ - 0.120¢
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 20 hours ago

Jesus H Christmas, that's depressing

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago

Oof. Top three, but at the same time, half as much as the top paying site does.

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Oh, damn. Thank you, my data was outdated then. I guess I'll have to move things to Qobuz, which was a pain last time I transferred a library.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

Can't wait for my new hard-drive to arrive so I can further expand my lossless music collection even more.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 23 hours ago

Unfortunately (or maybe fortunately?) I can't hear a difference between lossless and reasonable bitrate compressed files, so...

load more comments
view more: next ›