this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
796 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

75041 readers
3045 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is the technology worth trillions of dollars huh

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Listen, we just have to boil the ocean five more times.

Then it will hallucinate slightly less.

Or more. There’s no way to be sure since it’s probabilistic.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

"This is the technology worth trillions of dollars"

You can make anything fly high in the sky with enough helium, just not for long.

(Welcome to the present day Tech Stock Market)

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Bubbles and crashes aren't a bug in the financial markets, they're a feature. There are whole legions of investors and analysts who depend on them. Also, they have been a feature of financial markets since anything resembling a financial market was invented.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Hey look the markov chain showed its biggest weakness (the markov chain)!

In the training data, it could be assumed by output that Connecticut usually follows Colorado in lists of two or more states containing Colorado. There is no other reason for this to occur as far as I know.

Markov Chain based LLMs (I think thats all of them?) are dice-roll systems constrained to probability maps.

Edit: just to add because I don't want anyone crawling up my butt about the oversimplification. Yes. I know. That's not how they work. But when simplified to words so simple a child could understand them, its pretty close.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Oh l I was thinking it's because people pronounce it Connedicut

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 5 points 19 hours ago

I was wondering if you'd get similar results for states with the letter R, since there's lots of prior art mentioning these states as either "D" or "R" during elections.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 27 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

Yesterday i asked Claude Sonnet what was on my calendar (since they just sent a pop up announcing that feature)

It listed my work meetings on Sunday, so I tried to correct it…

You’re absolutely right - I made an error! September 15th is a Sunday, not a weekend day as I implied. Let me correct that: This Week’s Remaining Schedule: Sunday, September 15

Just today when I asked what’s on my calendar it gave me today and my meetings on the next two thursdays. Not the meetings in between, just thursdays.

Something is off in AI land.

Edit: I asked again: gave me meetings for Thursday’s again. Plus it might think I’m driving in F1

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

A few weeks ago my Pixel wished me a Happy Birthday when I woke up, and it definitely was not my birthday. Google is definitely letting a shitty LLM write code for it now, but the important thing is they're bypassing human validation.

Stupid. Just stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] achance4cheese@sh.itjust.works 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Also, Sunday September 15th is a Monday… I’ve seen so many meeting invites with dates and days that don’t match lately…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 51 points 1 day ago (14 children)

You joke, but I bet you didn't know that Connecticut contained a "d"

I wonder what other words contain letters we don't know about.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The famous 'invisible D' of Connecticut, my favorite SCP.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago

That actually sounds like a fun SCP - a word that doesn't seem to contain a letter, but when testing for the presence of that letter using an algorithm that exclusively checks for that presence, it reports the letter is indeed present. Any attempt to check where in the word the letter is, or to get a list of all letters in that word, spuriously fail. Containment could be fun, probably involving amnestics and widespread societal influence, I also wonder if they could create an algorithm for checking letter presence that can be performed by hand without leaking any other information to the person performing it, reproducing the anomaly without computers.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ChatGPT is just as stupid.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 20 hours ago

it's actually getting dumber.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 12 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

We're turfing out students by the tens on academic misconduct. They are handing in papers with references that clearly state "generated by Chat GPT". Lazy idiots.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

This is why invisible watermarking of AI-generated content is likely to be so effective. Even primitive watermarks like file metadata. It's not hard for anyone with technical knowledge to remove, but the thing with AI-generated content is that anyone who dishonestly uses it when they are not supposed to is probably also too lazy to go through the motions of removing the watermarking.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Djehngo@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (47 children)

The letters that make up words is a common blind spot for AIs, since they are trained on strings of tokens (roughly words) they don't have a good concept of which letters are inside those words or what order they are in.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

It's very funny that you can get ChaptGPT to spell out the word (making each letter an individual token) and still be wrong.

Of course it makes complete sense when you know how LLMs work, but this demo does a very concise job of short-circuiting the cognitive bias that talking machine == thinking machine.

load more comments (46 replies)
[–] mrductape@eviltoast.org 108 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Well, it's almost correct. It's just one letter off. Maybe if we invest millions more it will be right next time.

Or maybe it is just not accurate and never will be....I will not every fully trust AI. I'm sure there are use cases for it, I just don't have any.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Close. We natives pronounce it 'kuh ned eh kit'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

No, this is Google throwing the cheapest possible shit at you that is barely capable of stringing together 5 coherent sentences and has the reasoning capability of a tapeworm.

Here is the output of the minimalist open Chinese model Qwen3, that runs locally on my 6 year old mid-end PC:

The US states that contain the letter "d" (case-insensitive, as state names are typically capitalized) are as follows. I've verified each state name for the presence of the letter "d" in its standard spelling:

    Colorado (contains "d" in "Colorado")  
    Delaware (starts with "D")  
    Florida (contains "d" in "Florida")  
    Idaho (contains "d" in "Idaho")  
    Indiana (contains "d" in "Indiana")  
    Maryland (ends with "d" in "Maryland")  
    Nevada (contains "d" in "Nevada")  
    North Dakota (contains "d" in "Dakota")  
    Rhode Island (contains "d" in "Rhode")  
    South Dakota (contains "d" in "Dakota")  


Total: 10 states.
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago (8 children)

I get the sentiment behind this post, and it's almost always funny when LLM are such dumbass. But this is not a good argument against the technology. It is akin to climate change denier using the argument: "look! It snowed today, climate change is so dumb huh ?"

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

It’s not worth the environmental impact

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

AI writes code for me. It makes dumbass mistakes that compilers automatically catch. It takes three or four rounds to correct a lot of random problems that crop up. Above all else, it's got limited capacity - projects beyond a couple thousand lines of code have to be carefully structured and spoonfed to it - a lot like working with junior developers. However: it's significantly faster than Googling for the information needed to write the code like I have been doing for the last 20 years, it does produce good sample code (if you give it good prompts), and it's way less frustrating and slow to work with than a room full of junior developers.

That's not saying we fire the junior developers, just that their learning specializations will probably be very different from the ones I was learning 20 years ago, just as those were very different than the ones programmers used 40 and 60 years ago.

[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I agree, cursor and other IDE integration have been a game changer. It made it way easier for a certain range of problems we used to have in software dev. And for every easy code, like prototyping, or inconsequential testing, it's so so fast. What I found is that, it is particularly efficient at helping you do stuff you would have been able to do alone, and are able to check once it's done. Need to be careful when asking stuff you aren't familiar with though, cause it will comfortably lead you toward a mistake that will waste your time.

Though one thing I have to say: I'm very annoyed by it's constant agreeing with what I say, and enabling me when I'm doing dumb shit. I wish it would challenge me more and tell me when I'm an idiot.

"Yes you are totally right", "This is a very common issue that everybody has", "What a great and insightful question"...... I'm so tired of this BS.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›