this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
64 points (87.2% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
3529 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/53766411

Mobile phone Debian based

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gueoris@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (4 children)

6.7" with 1600x720 is crazy in 2025.

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It sounds great but I have no idea what the resolution on my phone is right now. After 640x480 my brain stopped comprehension

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] notgold@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago

Can't even rent ultra porn 😒

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

phones are at least full-HD, so 1920x1080. computer displays too. It's even more of a weird choice for that very large size, I imagine you can clearly see and count the pixels

[–] Nima@leminal.space 4 points 2 months ago

my phone that came out in 2020 has better specs than this one and is so much cheaper.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't really care for that. OLED would be more import than screen resolution. But that surely depends on the use-case. I don't game on it and don't watch media. Even if I'd do, it would be fine on this tiny screen.

[–] Gueoris@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The screen is huge for a phone. This type of screen resolution can damage the eyes on a large screen (the lower the dpi, the greater the strain on the eyes to bring the screen into focus).

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Sure sure, but it also depends on the use-case. I use mine as an emergency-phone and notifications from my own apps. Occasionally a chat. Couldn't care less for eye strain. Besides I grew up with crt-screens that fried my retinas 😁

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Crazy terribly bad

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

more alternative https://sailmates.net/actors/

Companies selling phones with alternative mobile OSes

Name URL Available pre-installed OSes Furi Labs https://furilabs.com/ FuryOS Murena https://murena.com/ /e/OS Pine64 https://pine64.org/, https://pine64eu.com/ postmarketOS, Mobian, Manjaro+Plasma Mobile Purism https://puri.sm/ PureOS Volla https://volla.online/ Ubuntu Touch, Volla OS Jolla/Reeder https://jolla.com/ Sailfish OS

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

Also the Mudita Kompakt if you're into e ink screens

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

I am so irritated by my iPhone lately that I want to love this and adopt it, but…the specs are awful, and it’s made of plastic. Ugghh. I’m so conflicted

For context I did up a comparison of my iPhone to the FLX1s

iPhone 16 Pro vs FLX1S

Spec iPhone 16 Pro FLX1S
Display Size 6.3″ Super Retina XDR OLED 6.7″ IPS LCD
Resolution 2622 × 1206 (460 ppi) 1600 × 720
Refresh Rate 120Hz ProMotion 90Hz
Glass / Front Protection Ceramic Shield Dragontrail Glass
Always‑On Display Yes No
Dynamic Island Yes No
Processor / Chip Apple A18 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 900
CPU 6‑core (2 performance + 4 efficiency) 2× Cortex‑A78 @ 2.4 GHz + 6× A55 @ 2.0 GHz
GPU 6‑core Apple GPU Mali‑G68 MC4
RAM 8 GB LPDDR5X 8 GB LPDDR4x
Storage 128 GB ‑ 1 TB NVMe 128 GB UFS
SD Card Support No Yes (microSD up to 1 TB)
Rear Cameras 48MP Main + Ultra Wide + Telephoto 20MP Main + 2MP Macro
Front Camera 12MP TrueDepth 13MP
Video Recording Up to 4K @ 120fps (Dolby Vision, ProRes) Likely up to 1080p
Battery ~3582 mAh (not officially disclosed) 5,000 mAh Li‑Po
Charging & USB USB‑C (USB 3), MagSafe & Qi2 USB‑C (USB 2.0), Wired only
Wireless Charging Yes No
5G Support Yes (mmWave + Sub‑6) Yes
WiFi WiFi 7 WiFi 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
SIM / eSIM Dual eSIM only Dual SIM
Biometric Security Face ID (TrueDepth) Side‑mounted fingerprint
Materials / Frame Titanium frame, Ceramic Shield front Polycarbonate frame, glass back
Water / Splash Resistance IP68 (6m up to 30 min) Splash‑resistant
Weight 199 g 201 g
Price From US$999 US$550
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why is dynamic island a feature? Seems like a good thing that something doesn't have that nonsense, since the whole thing is a workaround for having a hole in your screen.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wasn’t even sure what that was, honestly. Is that the oval space around the front camera?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah exactly. The gimmick created around the fact that there's a hole in the screen where the front-facing camera is, to mask the glaring hole like it's a feature instead of a drawback.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

“There’s a giant hole in the screen. And we think you’re gonna love it.”

“And if you don’t, then fuck you.”

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's not an iPhone competitor. What's the point in completing 2 devices which such different prices. The iPhone is 2x the price of this thing.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Same feeling thanks for the table comparison

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would pay double for better specs. Like, clearly, because I did. This Liquid Glass nonsense feels like a gimmick from the 00’s. Steve Jobs must be rolling over in his grave. He’s probably been rolling over since all the stock buybacks started.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

you have just proven that specifications wise it's a viable phone lol

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

the specs are awful,

well the screen is weird, and why is this USB 2 (really, what's behind this? the fairphone 6 got a downgrade to usb 2 too), but that's it. oh and the plastic but I guess it depends on what kind, it can be ok

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I want tap to pay. It’s thing the mainstream phones have that Linux phones don’t that I want. Well that and wireless charging.

[–] slamphear@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The FLX1 had wireless charging. And a headphone jack. And a replaceable battery… 😔

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Never heard of, but sounds great. I was also lucky to read "based in HK" as I feared it'd be us-based 😊

But...what about the camera? Is it worth anything?

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

Oh dang...that really isn't a good selling point. Would've bought the older one for more instead a downgrade for the same. Why the heck.... More profit? My enthusiasm is slightly dampened. Not much competition anyway 😞

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

This is hugely disappointing. They launched a worse all around phone and are trying to market it like good news. I was seriously considering them for my next phone purchase, but if this is all they offer when the time comes, I will have to skip it... The only "upgrade" is 2 more GB of ram, but the screen is worse (slightly bigger, significantly worse resolution), camera is worse, no headphone jack, not IP68... They also mention that existing orders for the old version are either being "upgraded" to this new version, or refunded. So it sounds like the original FLX1 is dead in the water. Very sad news.