this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
132 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

74233 readers
4647 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Make a .kids tld. Require certification to host on it. Let parents and schools filter to only that domain if they like.

Leave everybody else the fuck alone.

Tired of the stupidity that is congress, both state and federal.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago

Once upon a time there was .edu

But such limitations usually have failed.

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It isn't enough for them to make a 'child friendly' space. Because it isn't about being child friendly. They must impose themselves on EVERYBODY so they can look and go 'I MADE EVERYONE CONFORM.'

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Making TLDs for restricted content (.adu or .xxx) would be a super easy way to filter sites as well. To me it's like putting Playboys or whatever at the top of the rack with an opaque plastic -- nothing is physically stopping kids from getting to it except gross negligence from every adult in the vicinity.

Oh, looks like the TLD .xxx actually is a thing (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/.xxx). Never heard of any site using it. I guess there's generally zero pressure to register one.

Edit: did some research

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, that's backwards. You want to whitelist, deny by default, not whack a mole a blacklist. Then you set it once and done. Hence the certification requirement to be on the whitelist.

There is nothing stopping a kid-friendly .com that is certified from having that site in .kids as well.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Go to touch.kids for all your tTouchy needs!

Direct login to your profile: touch.my.kids

[–] cm0002@piefed.world 0 points 1 day ago

Not a bad idea, or a mass register of all certified kid friendly domains regardless of TLD that such filtering software can freely pull from

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago

They are also opening a new giant datacenter there that will use more energy than everyone in the state five times over. Red states lol.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago