this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
228 points (95.2% liked)

politics

26620 readers
2170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 88 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of course she forgives him, he's the reason the money is all hers now.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

That section of the far right is basically why Kirk was doing a "comeback tour" they've been harassing him for years.

It's a safe bet she understands that the shooter was another faction of the far right and that if people keep talking about it, the well dries up. Because she's lived for years with their harassment

When right wingers think "a leftist" killed him, they give blindly

They figure out a right-winger killed a right-winger, and they'll all start picking sides.

trump is so anxious to push this, he's going to fuck around and people will hear what really happened. Especially since the shooter has zero reason to try for a plea deal now.

He's taking it to trial and going on the stand, because every politician involved has said they want the death penalty.

The shooter literally has nothing to lose.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He's taking it to trial and going on the stand, because every politician involved has said they want the death penalty.

Is this speculation or has there been a statement?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

About if they're going to push for the death penalty? Yes, the governor and Trump have both explicitly called for it, and the judge told him it was on the table when reading him his charges

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I meant about Robinson taking the stand.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago

Oh... I misread that as taking a stand, but that seems unlikely seeing as he's just been provided a lawyer. That's a very bold move in a case like this, and this is negligently early in the process to decide that

With how much misinfo there is in this case, I wouldn't believe it unless it comes from the lawyer directly

[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What ever happened to the guy that grazed Trumps ear?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He was killed at the scene almost immediately...

The one who was going to shoot him on a golf course, I believe is trying to represent himself in court.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 69 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This dumb fucking rapist couldn’t even keep it about a memorial to a shit stain that was murdered.

Had to weaponize it and make it about himself and further push his civil war agenda he wants so badly that’s already started.

Fuck sakes.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 31 points 2 months ago

Of course he had to, that was the entire point of it all. This was a huge Nuremberg rally in memory of their Horst Wessel.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

empathy for kirk? he would be spinning in his grave

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Holding hat solemnly, looking down, nodding :"it's what he would have wanted."

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He was a bad person, but the full quote should still be presented.

"I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That's a separate topic for a different time."

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's curious that a master debater would put forth the notion that empathy is a "made-up" or "new age" term. But that's assuming this guy was ever "debating" in good faith.

By the way, "new age" is frequently a term that I've seen the hard right xtianists toss around. Seems to be a way of in-group signaling that xtianists like to use, especially in mixed company or when they don't want to scare away people they are trying to red-pill. Behind closed doors, they'd rather go hard and just say it's witchcraft or occultism, etc. But they seem to be constantly worried about their pure xtian America is getting infected by new age stuff...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

When an evangelical christian 'forgives' you for something, what that actually is is them forgiving themselves for literally anything they do to you after that.

That is them saying that you are totally lost, do not count as a real human being with agency, and thus anything further they do to you is justified, because in their minds, you are not capable of making sensible decisions.

It is a threat, framed deceptively as kindness, and yes, they know they are lying.

[–] Beebabe@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This absolutely nails it. (Grew up in a southern baptist church.)

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Solidarity to a another survivor, though we're probably from different sides of the continent, and the doctrine and rituals may differ somewhat, the underlying psychology is largely the same at its core.

'Well, bless your heart' + a shit eating grin ain't exactly a common saying where I'm from, but I know exactly what it means.

[–] Beebabe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Escaped a long time ago. I never bought religion. So I enjoyed those sentiments and socially sanctioned holier than thou shunning for decades. Thankfully up north now.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm not saying she hasn't actually forgiven him, but I will say I doubt genuine forgiveness for the killing of one's spouse is happening under a month in, given forgiveness requires actually processing the harm done, and that actions are far easier than words. Will she call for him to be shown mercy rather than death? Will she work to heal divides? Will she condemn calls for retaliation?

It's so easy to say that you forgive someone then allow others to retaliate in full force. But the forgiveness Christians are supposed to have is modeled by a dying christ pleading for mercy for his killers.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

She has not truly forgiven him, she is being a manipulative psycopath.

She will not press for mercy, she will not work to heal divides, beyond possibly those within the right wing so as to shore up the basis of her own political power.

And she absolutely will not condemn calls for retaliation, unless a scenario arises where she personally would stand to lose social status or material wealth by not doing so.

She is a heartless fascist, sure, she has emotions, but her whole life is mostly all about learning how to weaponize that.

Just as horny men grovel and simp for a woman showing skin, 'Godly' men have a perfect excuse to be extremely angry when they witness a 'Good Christian Woman' making a show of being distraught, but tough, and ultimately leaving it all up to God.

Its like move 1, page 1, on the sympathy generating playbook for these people.

While Gandhi is a much more uh, morally complex figure, shall we say, than a lot of people know about, and this quote may be apocryphal, it nevertheless roughly sums up how I feel about Christian extremists:

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

It's performative. It makes her look magnanimous, which feeds her vanity. It's like praying in public to signal how holy you are.

As you alluded, forgiveness is reflected in your works. Asking for mercy, urging calm, etc. But she's not doing any of those things. Why?

Bear with me for a moment on something. I'm not religious myself, but one of the biggest problems with the evangelical Christian faith is the belief that a person is saved through faith alone (sola fide), rather than both faith and works like the Bible itself makes clear.

John 14:14-17:

What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, and one of you says to them, “Depart in peace, be warmed and filled,” but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what does it profit? Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.

While I'm sure Luther believed the doctrine of sola fide genuinely, it was certainly advantageous if you were trying to win converts if you didn't have to do anything. It's a hollow, easy philosophy invented by Paul. It's certainly not the first time Paul would advocate for a doctrine based on its ability to win converts more easily; cf. Paul's ministry to the Gentiles regarding circumcision.

I think this is the root of a lot of problems with evangelical Christianity and the people who espouse it.

I have difficulty seeing purity in someone who pays themselves $12 million per year (as Kirk allegedly did) to run a company whose mission is to indoctrinate students early on with propaganda rooted in hate and misogyny. When they live in a mansion. When they join themselves at the hip with a cruel authoritarian bully.

Sorry, their works thus far are evidence enough for me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 32 points 2 months ago

Of course she forgives him. In a split second she went from an enslaved conservative wife, to a multi millionaire to top tier conservative grifter candidate. She literally spent a solid chunk of her speech talking about how married women aren't slaves. I have literally never heard anyone say this kind of thing at a funeral before. These people are vile, and they tell on themselves constantly.

She's absolutely set for life now, and I look forward to all of the future tabloid fodder about her and all of the vile Christian men in her circle who will try to get a piece of that action in the coming years.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Does that make her a foe of trump?

[–] manxu@piefed.social 25 points 2 months ago

Eventually everyone becomes a foe of Trump

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

trump flatout said he's going to take her dead husbands company...

If she's smart, she is a foe of trump. Because trump won't hesitate to steal from a widow and children

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I like how all these brave defenders of freedom somehow manage to never actually serve in the military.

Kirk applied to West Point, and when he didn't make the cut blamed everyone but himself. He could have joined the Army and gone through OCS, but decided that it was better to let other people die for his freedom.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd like to point out that a person does not have to serve in the military in order to actual defend our freedoms. In fact, I'd argue that there have been very few people in the military since WW2 to have actually fought for our freedoms.

But you know who did fight for our freedoms? Who literally took a bullet for our freedoms, but still kept fighting? Larry Flynt. He did more to protect our 1st Amendment rights than any living politician (at least that I can think of at the moment).

We need more heroic, piece of shit, smut peddlers like Larry Flynt... when America looks in the mirror, he is who we should see reflected.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago

According to a quick check Larry tried to join the army at age 15 and was rejected. He later served in the Navy.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

Or he could have gone to any senior military college which gives you a commission on graduation.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, because the guy that put a hole through her husband's neck made her even richer, which is all she cares about. She probably likes him more than she liked Kirk.

[–] kittyjynx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

She told her daughter that "Daddy is on a business trip with Jesus so he could afford her blueberry budget". Fucking evil.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe her for a moment

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Why? Maybe she didn't give two shits about Kirk. If he lived the way he talked she most likely was in an abusive relationship. Now he dead and she gets all those millions.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago

Because shortly after the shooting she went on camera and proclaimed that she was going to take over his media accounts and his media legacy (basically his business) and run it in his spirit. This is all about the money.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

Majority of white women voted for Trump. Abusive relationship no doubt, but she was probably into it.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Bet if he was black, queer, or left there would be no forgiveness.

[–] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Conflicting messaging on brand for conservatives

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago

Conflicting messages is baked in. The enemy is so strong we have to be prepared to fight every day, and so weak that they must plot in secret.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

He hates people who dress up like him for Hallowe'en.

Im surprised he hasn’t hired her for some administration job, he loves surrounding himself with women who look like her

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Awww... She forgives the Republican who killed her husband.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Forgiveness from Serena ‘kKk’ Joy is always special.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

how can she forgive his killer when we don't know who it is? (also when it was probably actually the government lol)

also, don't care erikkka, you're still a nazi

load more comments
view more: next ›