this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

5796 readers
189 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Honestly now: does anybody actually like that style of emojis/avatars? They create a strong negative reaction in me but I am not sure why.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

They perfectly illustrate the Corporate Mindset. I like to imagine they were designed by a conclave of neurotypical and painfully unfunny and uncreative MBAs who got together in a coworking space and brainstormed the most consensual and least offensive avatar tech they could fathom. Likely none of them ever had a passing thought about what makes for compelling character design. Certainly none of them can stomach the idea of emergent phenomenon in communication. And above all nothing must stick out; to them the idea that users would want to make a non-human, cyborg, furry, green-skinned, or whatever avatar is abhorrent. Jane's quirky facial expression is the full extent of allowable creativity (and even then you know they had a 30 minute debate about including it).

These avatars do a better job of inspiring dread in me than half the shit in Severance.

Tangentially, it reminds me of when we went from Geocities/MySpace/custom reddit CSS/custom youtube pages to "you can change your PP and banner". ..... okay? Was a unified design language really worth crushing all visual creativity?
... and now I think it's a shame that Lemmy and Mastodon's default clients don't support (AFAIK) custom CSS for communities/user pages. I think that would be very iconic for the Free Web. Is someone working on this? I feel like someone should be working on this.

[–] arken@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Yes they do. You're sane. Most people aren't.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

They are a fake as the people who use them?

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We had to fill out a "personal biography" at work a couple years ago. Under "Thing I'm Most Proud of" I put "Time Magazine Person of the Year, 2006".

[–] ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We had to fill out a “personal biography” at work

What reasoning did mgmt give for this? I'm weirded out

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago

Oh, no reason. But I was called into my manager's office because I hadn't turned it in early. I told everyone around me that they were looking to cut employees by figuring out who could handle more jobs.

Under "Hobbies" I put "Privateering". Under "Fluent Languages" I put "None".