this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
60 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

75606 readers
2430 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] __siru__@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

This feels like it could be exactly the type of thing that causes the car crash in the pilot episode of the Upload TV series.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 28 points 6 days ago

The setup they describe is so highly specific that it would also fool most human drivers.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

While There's a lot of room for improvement, I'd argue that many people would be fooled too. Depending on the mirror's size, placement and angle.

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 25 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"We show that by exploiting the physics of specular reflection, an adversary can inject phantom obstacles or erase real ones using only inexpensive mirrors," the researchers wrote in a paper submitted to the journal Computers & Security.

"Experiments on a full AV platform, with commercial-grade LIDAR and the Autoware stack, demonstrate that these are practical threats capable of triggering critical safety failures, such as abrupt emergency braking and failure to yield."

I'd be fooled, too, at first - and suspicious (who's fucking around with mirrors on the road?) - but I'd probably figure it out after a second.

My main concern is people could use these kinds of exploits to "jailbreak" robo-cars (or whatever we're calling them) to behave in dangerous ways in real traffic.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Oh okay, I have not factored in the idiots 😒

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

We must, unfortunately, factor in the idiots. They're quite pervasive.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

They’re quite pervasive.

🫲 Gestures broadly around at everything 🫴

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That'd need a new driving-license. With stricter checks. Not if applicants could memorize basic stuff but their emotional and intellectual maturity.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It is pretty disturbing that 99% of people driving havent been assessed in 10 years or more beyond “do you know what this yellow triangle is? Do you know what this red octagon is? Do you have at least one functioning eyeball?”

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Very true... But at least we do test it at all. Anyone is allowed to have tons of kids and offer them no live or makes them fat or....

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Isn't there an old engineering adage that anyone that tries to design something to be idiot proof generally severely underestimates the resourcefulness of idiots?

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

Something about that yes. Never underestimate the ingenuity of an idiot 🫤

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Yeah there’s always someone. Now that the door is open for these stunts we’ll see them in real life, including ones that full humans. It is critical to figure these out before we rely on the technology, because people are assholes.

I’ve been saying for years that traffic will get much worse when we get to mostly self-driving cars. Many of the holdouts will decide they can act dangerously on the road because the self driving cars will get out of their way.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Almost everything can be applied to anything when you scale up.

"Your surge protector doesn't even protect against a 500J surge"

"Yeah but yours doesn't protect against a million joule one. Checkmate."

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

Lol true too.

[–] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago

Any car company that relies on only 1 type of sensor or only 1 sensor on a car for autonomous driving is a fool. The key terminology is "sensor fusion", where you have multiple types of sensors to generate an accurate model of the world around the car which is vastly superior to what a human can perceive. LiDAR is only one sensor. Add in cameras and radar which many cars already have and you'll have a car that can't be fooled by just mirrors.

[–] tux7350@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago