this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

74265 readers
4189 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unit327@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I downloaded the entirety of wikipedia as of 2024 to use as a reference for "truth" in the post-slop world. Maybe I should grab the 2022 version as well just in case...

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would wikipedia of all things be your go to for that?

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

NATOpedia is a great resource if you go in with an assumption of a pro-western bias, but a source of truth lmao.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Someone is mad their sources got removed for not being credible.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What a shock that someone who pretends to be an anarchist would go to bat to defend the reliablity of far right western propaganda outlets like Radio Free Asia, the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, and the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. Remember, if it doesn't' have the Western Neo-liberal seal of approval, it's not credible and should be removed, that's the anarchist way!

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

What in the fuck are you talking about

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A lot of western liberals really do treat it like the Holy Scripture. Any intelligence agencies would just have to pay a few admins and higher some people to sculpt the list of "reliable sources" that Wikipedia uses and they can basically fully control what hundreds of millions of neoliberals believe.

And they have.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well you're free to submit sources that are credible and challenge that old ones aren't.