this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
253 points (99.2% liked)

politics

25887 readers
2674 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump is already freaking out over his inability to rig his upcoming lawsuit against former FBI chief James Comey after a Biden-era judge was appointed to oversee the case. U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff, first appointed in 2021, was randomly assigned to the Comey case. The lawsuit, which has been referred to as “among the worst abuses in DOJ history,” is already seen as a severe test of the American justice system and the president’s ability to weaponize the legal system to exact revenge on his adversaries.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 89 points 5 days ago

This judge better prepare for death threats.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago (3 children)

But in a telling slip, Trump referred to the appointment of Nachmanoff as a “good start” for Comey during an early-morning rant on Truth Social. “There is no way he can explain his way out of it,” Trump wrote of the charges against Comey. “He is a Dirty Cop, and always has been, but he was just assigned a Crooked Joe Biden-appointed Judge, so he’s off to a very good start.” In addition to revealing his true thoughts about the case, Trump’s inability to stop himself from providing live commentary may ultimately sink it. Trump’s complaints about the “unfairness” of the selection process could help defense lawyers argue the case is not about Comey lying to Congress, but about Trump using the legal system to settle old scores.

(That’s the rest of the article)

Trump’s DOJ Pick Humiliated After Embarrassing James Comey Spelling Error [archive link]

However, the quote attributed to Halligan, who has taken on the new role with no previous prosecutorial experience, contains a major spelling error.

“The balance of power is a bedrock principal of our democracy,” it reads, rather than “principle.”

Well we got no class! And we got no principals!

And she ain’t 35, gtfo.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Mar-a-Lago face aside, all that sneering can't be good for one's complexion.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

I'm sure she's in the sun a lot but that's a 50-year old elbow. Ironically I don't think she's had any surgery yet. I assume with all the Trump Barbies it's a requirement at some point.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Could what Trump wrote - with no punctuation - be construed as him calling a judge crooked?

I'm not too concerned. I just wanna see slander lawsuits.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago

An indictment is not a "lawsuit;" those are civil. What Trump is doing to Comey is a criminal prosecution.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

He's already lining up to an appeal at the surpreme court, using the fact that it is a biden era judge as an excuse.

[–] Kurious84@lemmings.world 7 points 4 days ago

Can you believe the hate coming from the office of the president. This is just hateful evil shit nonstop.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What am I missing? Why are they referring to the criminal indictment of Comey as a lawsuit?

[–] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Because it is? Criminal suits are also lawsuits. The indictment is the first step in that process. Even in cases where there is no clear individual plantiff, the governing body (city, state, or nation) fills that role.

All cases are brought before and served by a judge, and in this case there would be no jury, just a review, on legal precident, whether the charges put forth by the indictment are accurate or relevant to the legal code's stated therein.

Essentially, this is a lawsuit, just one based on precedent, which really is vibe-based and heavily depends on the judge assigned to the case. When there is no precedent or the legal justification is vague, a jury is also assigned.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This must be the first time I've seen a criminal case referred to this way. Thanks for the explanation.

[–] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

To be clear, an indictment is a document that kicks of the lawsuit process: "I acuse you of breaking X laws because I can present Y evidence to a judge proving you did that. Therefore, I sue you. Signed, law firm."

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It’s not commonly referred to that way though. If you’re on trial for murder you’re not referred to as “facing a lawsuit”, you’re referred to as on trial for murder! Comey’s on trial for a thing at least half of trump’s cabinet and all his SCROTUS picks are guilty guilty guilty of.