this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10488 readers
565 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rozodru@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago

Before reading the article I assumed it was involuntary care for mentally ill people living on the streets...but for addiction rehab? how the hell is that going to work?

FORCE someone to get clean? that never works. it's a waste of money. Now if these were for mentally ill individuals on the streets, sure I'm all for it. I personally believe it's more cruel and inhumane to allow people that are mentally checked out to wander the streets and cause harm to themselves and others than receive involuntary treatment. But for addiction? it'll never work. The only way to get clean is if you want to get clean. I'm a recovering alcoholic myself and the only way it stuck for me was when I actually WANTED to be sober and I have been for 10+ years. But it ONLY worked when I wanted it. trying previous times? didn't stick because I didn't care.

this isn't going to work at all.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

BC's New Democratic party continues to move to the far right.

I honestly don't understand how they can still operate under the CCF/NDP mantle.

Tommy Douglas would be disgusted at what they've done.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

So, we're back to violating people's basic human rights again? Cool.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I have to assume Canada has laws on the books dictating the criteria and legal mechanisms through which someone can be involuntarily hospitalized, correct? If so, this just sounds like increasing psych bed capacity, where people are framing it like some accomplishment that's going to "clean up the streets."

More psych bed capacity is a good thing (assuming they are well-run facilities). Changing the laws to force someone into treatment who's not an imminent risk of harm to themselves or others would not be good, but that's not what this reads like.

[–] Winthrowe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Does Canada have laws here or is it BC and the others? I’m a little fuzzy here on where this falls on the Fed/Crim vs Prov/Health side.