this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
148 points (98.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

9318 readers
1491 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)

Would they sell the rights of Dawngate? That's all Im asking for!

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 1 minute ago

They might actually try and sell every IP they can once they gathered as much info on users as they can.

[–] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

I will never understand how leveraged buyouts are legal. I mean it somehow makes sense in its original form where workers wore buying out the patron but now it is just weird.

[–] NovaSel@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

Oh it's a private equity firm

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It's time to actually mean it and stop buying from them. No, I mean it. Stahp.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 23 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Toys R Us still lives in Canada. She's practically just as you remember her. And she's happy. 🥲

[–] AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

2 of the 4 stores in Ottawa just closed and a 3rd one is going to soon. I don’t think Toys R Us is doing that well.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

If 1 is profitable and 3 aren't and it's a matter of geography, that's a sound business decision.

What kind of a sane business model would benefit from holding onto (and paying taxes on) property/assets that aren't profitable? 🧐

[–] AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 56 minutes ago

Yeah, that’s kind of my point. 3 of 4 stores in Ottawa aren’t profitable is probably an indicator that Toys R Us (at least in Ottawa) isn’t doing that well.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Do we really need 4 physical stores in Ottawa, though? I mean yea it’s sprawled to shit but still. Looks like the Merivale is still going and it’s at least pretty central. There are plenty of other toy stores around as well, so the concept of physical locations, at least, is still cruising.

[–] AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 57 minutes ago* (last edited 51 minutes ago)

Merivale is the one that will probably close soon. A few months ago, they sold the property and put the “store closing” signs up, but took them down when the sale fell through. I assume it will close again when they sell the property again.

The only one that I believe hasn’t closed or tried to close is the St. Laurent one. Even the one in Gatineau apparently had closing signs, but I don’t know if they actually closed or not yet.

[–] lemmyng@piefed.ca 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

She's practically just as you remember her.

Except for the soft play area they're adding. She's enshittifying.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 4 points 52 minutes ago

Toy store: adds play area for little children

You:

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Except for the soft play area they’re adding. She’s enshittifying.

why is that enshittifying?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

In Canada, enshittification makes things even better.

[–] absentbird@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

Last time I visited Canada I ate poutine twice in one day and you better believe I faced some enshittification. Great public toilets though; in the states it feels like every city has become a toilet desert, you need to buy a meal at a restaurant just to use a bathroom.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Excited to see the version of Call of Duty that the new Saudi owners produce.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago

Hopefully you won't experience it IRL.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget Trump's son in law

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

You mean Jared Kushner who along with the Saudis that bought EA?

Jared Kushner has a close relationship with Saudi Arabia, developing a strong alliance with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman during his time in the Trump administration. Since leaving office, Kushner has had significant business dealings with the kingdom, including a $2 billion investment from Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund into his private equity firm, Affinity Partners. This relationship has drawn scrutiny from ethics experts and congressional investigators.

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It's one of the aerial levels. :( :(

I'm sorry. I didn't create the news.

[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 11 points 18 hours ago

Gamer known as ea

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org -1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I can't tell if they're an optimist or just naive.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 9 points 8 hours ago

I asssumed they meant it was already shit, so cant be enshitifed further.?

Challenge accexpted ?

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I think they are claiming that EA is already shit? I’m not positive.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No you're right, but they seem to think that it can't get worse... and it very much can.

[–] Kraiden@piefed.social 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

:shrug: The EA logo might as well already be a big red stamp "DO NOT BUY!" Not like I could give them any LESS money

[–] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I think it's funny that EA publishes on steam now because you can see how bad the reviews are for e.g. the FC game. Most people are obviously not happy with the quality of the games. But some still buy them year after year, for reasons that elude me

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 3 points 8 hours ago

Their base is casual gamers where it's basically the only game they buy each year. The cost is very small in those terms, and they don't want to be on the old version despite the issues.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 10 hours ago

I just assume most people are idiots. That really explains a lot of these things.

[–] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 15 hours ago

Where does a boycott end and "their products are just shit" begin?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In his first term, the economy didn't tank. That's it, that's the difference.

It did once his dead switches triggered. Remember that tax bill that gave everyone tax breaks for four years then jumped higher than before? Ya, that was intentional.