this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
134 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

74296 readers
3634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I still have a walkman in my eurorack (the Loopman from Error Intruments).

[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago

this looks awesome!

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Honestly there were some food points back then. A lot of people simply are not able to wear headphones responsibly. It's only gotten worse with noise cancelling technology. The ability to ignore the outside world is great when you're in a safe space to do so, but people doing it out in public or while driving are absolutely mad.

The quotes about "breaking societal connections" or whatever are funny to me though. Because that was happening at the time, but it had far more to do with the erosion of 3rd places and the rise of car-centric infrastructure than it did headphones.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

tons of people in multi-use trails are just completely obvious to everyone trying to pass them. and then of course, when you do pass them, they panic and scream and throw a tantrum about how you almost hit them.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

When I run and come on people who clearly have no idea I'm there, I yell "HEY," when I'm like 15 feet back or so. That's all I feel obligated to do. If you wander around the world completely unaware that it ain't a private server, you deserve a little scare.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"breaking societal connections", yeah. I don't remember where I saw an old photo of a train car full of people, all immersed in their... newspapers.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

you can speak to a reader, you can call for their attention.

with bluetooth earphones and smartphones, it's like you're in two different realities. Because other people stop existing in that bubble, because they become part of the background, bubbled people stop caring about them.

Honestly on the bus or train it's kinda nice to just be in a bubble. Obviously you still need to be aware to some degree but I remember my college bus trips being a nice isolated time most days.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Because other people stop existing in that bubble, because they become part of the background, bubbled people stop caring about them.

See also !fuckcars@lemmy.world

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago

"Will personal headphones lead to a world of silence?" We could have wished.

Also, the OG Walkman still looks brilliant. I wish they'd bring the headphone design back.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Same as it always was with new technology. On a side note, I wish these were still made like they were. New portable cassette players all have the same terrible tape heads and the models from the glory days are really starting to fall to disrepair as time passes. I just had to cannibalize one of my Walkmans to fix the other, only to have the same issue resurface nearly immediately.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

I was looking to get one, but a lot seem to be mono only. Otherwise Retekess TR606 looked interesting, even if just mostly as a toy.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How's the Fiio player? Also crappy heads?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Thats one I haven't forked over for yet. It appears very chunky and I like my cassette players slim for pocket storage so I did not consider it.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fiio player? If you’re referring to the Echo Mini, it’s just a digital player. It’s just aesthetically a tape player.

Edit: I stand corrected

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unless they clearly say so, assume the same crappy Chinese magnetic head/motor combo single integrated module as in every other cassette player these days. I wouldn't buy it.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They do indeed specify some sort of high voltage precision motor and a copper flywheel. And they claim a custom movement design.

And since it is an enthusiast device from a company with a good reputation, you can easily find teardowns online.

Anyway, you can read reviews online, there are plenty of them, and make your own mind.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh neat! Didn’t know this was a thing. Not something I need, but glad to know it exists.

I’d be surprised if it was anything other than the cheap mechanisms everything else gets. There’s very few companies manufacturing them and Techmoan is always on top of modern cassette systems and hasn’t brought it up. I could always be wrong, though.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It's probably true for the head, but at least coming from Fiio there's a good chance the rest of the system (motor, flywheel, etc) is top notch at least.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fascinating article. I never that there was this sort of opposition to the walkman.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Great read, I had a walkman all the way into the late 90's, before I traded it in for a cd version.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Living in a city, I can kind of get it. The number of people who simply walk in front of my bike because they're absorbed in their phone has made my commute stressful. I ended up installing a car horn on my bike which I'm sure makes their commute more stressful.

Perhaps the Walkman was the first time technology isolated people from the world around them.

Or I dunno, books.

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The car horn on your bike is hilarious. Tangentially, a fun thing to try is using a bike bell on an escalator while standing behind people. We're so conditioned to being dinged and moving aside that people do it before they even think about what's going on.

[–] BlackAura@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Watched a guy using an air horn on his bike riding around a European city using it on people walking in the bike lanes. So many people had no idea they were in a dedicated bike lane. Either blocking it or walking in it or crossing over it right in front of him.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Had a young man almost walk straight into my car at the supermarket. He was listening to whatever on headphones and drifting sideways across the lot. We came to a stop and waited to see if he'd hit us. His mom was watching and not saying a word! :)

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Like always, outrage over useful tech is driven by stubborn conservatives hellbent on making everyone else suffer because "society".

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Hmm, I’ve never seen someone directly link conservatism to the entire concept of society.

I didn’t know considering societal conditions was conservative. But I guess conservative leaders in the US did implement a lot of environmental protections. 🤔

Where does the line actually fall, do you think? I assume I’m over extending a bit here. Making assumptions about what you mean.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well, you are taking the excuse given at face value. Do you also think laws for back doors in encryption systems are to protect the children?

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Back doors are never safe. Never a good idea. They are always eventually a security hole.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And you think conservatives are genuinely trying to pass these other laws for the good of society and not for control?

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Can you write up the logic chain that made you assume I think any particular law is good for society, let alone the one you focused on?

All I was commenting on was the idea that conservatives are the ones crying “we live in a society” and not progressives. I’ve always considered progressive ideas to be more in touch with “we live in a society!” Than conservatives who want to punish and suppress marginalized groups who are, in fact, part of society.

What the hell man?

“Fuck you I got mine” is not considering others and ignores that we live in a society. And that’s what these conservative leaders are all about.

Corporations having no responsibility for the environment and the communities they are part of is a conservative ideal. It does not support society.

I noted the environmental laws because they were exceptions, and look a bit surprising in retrospect. When one learns Nixon passed major environmental laws, they are often surprised.

Oh wait, are you here to say those environmental laws, things like the clean air act are just tools of control over the common man. Clean air and water is oppression?

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Progressives say, "We live in a society, so let's not harm each other." Conservatives say, "Do what I want, not what you want, or society will crumble." Take a look at all the morality laws, and try to find even two where the ultimate result isn't punishment for daring to live in a manner they don't agree with. And the overwhelming majority of those morality laws are passed by conservatives. Even libertarians complain if someone has the audacity to tax them for the roads they use, especially the ones they use indirectly.

Even when the laws are for good reasons, control is applied. Do you not see how unnecessary regulatory burden can be used as a tool for gatekeeping? As for environmental laws, it's a bit audacious to talk about Nixon given what Trump has done in the last couple months. Who in their right mind (who isn't profiting from the sale of coal) wants to keep coal plants that operate at a loss around, whether you believe in climate change or not?

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ok buddy. This conversation is broken. You keep asserting that I think regulation is always good. Like I’m on the side of Trump and Nixon and back doors and banning vpns or whatever the fuck else. You invented that.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

No, I keep pointing out how you're cherry-picking how conservatives are good.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was being facetious. That's the excuse these idiots use for every single "new" thing.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Ok, see that makes a lot more sense than whatever the other guy who replied to me is going on about and accusing me of.

Thanks for the reply.