this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
259 points (99.6% liked)

People Twitter

8280 readers
1221 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 minutes ago* (last edited 13 minutes ago)

Ello Gov'nor

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 22 minutes ago

I had to do a double take. I thought this was an Onion type story. I'm extremely disappointed in the world.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 hours ago

Why does it look so done with our shit already?!

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

My local radio was saying that apparently my area is supposed to be getting more Waymos even though people from other places in the country called in just to reinforce that these things are not ready and have been recorded (as in video proof) of having operated in error.

I do not get this country's stubbornness to avoid putting down rail and just letting civilization progress the way it should be: WITHOUT driver-less AI mobile coffins. This is madness.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 31 minutes ago

You sound like you should go yell at some clouds.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Truck-kun is watching you.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Please let the harem be all consenting adults....

If wishes were horses, there'd be a horse girl harem with the age explained away by comparing it to the lifespan of horses: "She's already middle aged in horse years."

[–] alaphic@lemmy.world 36 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, cuz my life isn't fucked up enough already or anything, now I have to worry about random cars giving me the side eye because I don't already like them enough?

Tf weird ass dystopia even is this?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 25 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine a car, malfunctioning, looking at you while it hits you.

[–] alaphic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Sounds like my ex, only it can actually drive itself....

[–] EvilFonzy@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago
[–] MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

There is a real psychological effect to it. I think Mercedes was first to test it years ago. not with eyes but with a long LED light strip in the upper area of the front window. The goal was to communicate the "attention" of the vehicle to a pedestrian waiting to cross the street in a similar way that real drivers catch eye contact with pedestrians. This reassures the pedestrian that it is safe to cross the street - hey the guy sees me, I can safely go.

Without this feedback it has been found that people are overly cautious, not trusting the autonomous vehicles and it simply causes stress.

This is a real problem discovered years ago that has a novel funny solution instead of LED strip :)

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 5 points 6 hours ago

Yeah the idea is solid, the execution.... unsettling!

I think a better solution might be something like a few large lights with aimable lenses and about the level of brightness of a traffic light. The lenses allow you to direct the lighting such that a person being "focused" on sees a clear indicator on the vehicle, but someone outside that focus area would not see the light.

Im sure there's more to it than that, but a way to signal to pedestrians that the vehicle is aware of them and waiting for them to move solves a real problem.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In partially automated production processes where robots move around alongside humans, robots may be programmed to “look” in the direction they intend to move before moving. This may be by rotating their chassis or via LEDs/screens. This allows the humans to anticipate the robot’s movements rather than be surprised by it.

This is from a TV documentary I saw years ago, so you won’t get a source for me. Trust me, bro… or don’t.

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 4 points 7 hours ago

I've heard the same thing with robots giving people space. I heard about some study or another where humans working alongside robots (e.g. robotic arms in a factory) felt a lot more comfortable when robots exaggerated how much distance they put between themselves and the person to signal that they "know" the person is there and won't run into them.

[–] ComradePedro@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

I much prefer the LED strips lol

[–] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 9 points 8 hours ago

Reminds me of something...

Street Cleaning robot from Pixar's "Robots" animated film from 2005. Robot has one big awkward eye in the middle that looks around at others while it cleans

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That’s not a Land Rover, that’s the vacuum cleaner from Brave Little Toaster.

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 3 points 7 hours ago

Alternatively,

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

I was thinking Chevron was gonna take a page out of Nintendo's playbook on Pokemon and try to get in on this.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The problem with this approach is this: If the car indicates that it noticed me, how can I be sure that it won’t decide I’m just a tree within the next millisecond?

[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think you'll be alright, autonomous cars generally avoid hitting trees as well as people

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

Indeed, but trees don’t have a habit of stepping onto the road.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Trust them, bro

[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 hours ago

Had the opportunity to make it cute

Thing looks like it wants to suck the marrow from your bones.