this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
479 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
1086 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 159 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I thought it had had that for twenty years?

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 83 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah I don't know why profiles itself are being mentioned as a new thing. What's new is the more convenient interface for them

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 24 points 1 month ago (9 children)

you don't like about:profiles?

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Show of Hands:

Who's heard of "about:profiles"?

🦗🦗🦗

Been using it for years.

Been using multi account containers [1] for a couple weeks, complete with per-tab-SSL vpns.

[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/

[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wait till you hear about:about

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I use them all the time, they're great. I learned about it from another random Lemmy comment

[–] Mechanite@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I use it so much I have the tab pinned

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think they are just making a ui to manage it natively.

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

firefox -p was also an UI. Not as fancy as this one.

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 13 points 1 month ago

Also about:profiles if it’s already running

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pogmommy@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Impressive that theyre finally adding a feature that ive already been using. Makes you wonder how they do that

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 27 points 1 month ago

A feature that has been present for 20 years, but never exposed in the interface. Truly magical.

[–] UncleArthur@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Quite. It's how I've been watching YouTube ad-free for ages.

[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 47 points 1 month ago

I already use profiles in Firefox but this looks a much better interface for managing them.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

uhhh, this has been a thing for a long time already. I don't know whats new here. put about:profiles in your url bar for anyone uses a firefox based browser.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago

The UI was clearly not user friendly.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Feels super strange to read this. They had profiles for what, decades now? It just required a simple command line flag.

I mean, this is better, but... Yeah.

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So...... about:profiles is what then ‽‽

[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

about:profiles always worked for me. And the profile manager. I don't need a 3rd ui for switching profiles.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The new one is a much better experience. It works like profiles in chrome now. The old one is still there for you to use if you prefer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think containers (that Firefox already has) are a much better way to handle this. Profiles, art least the way they are implemented on chrome, feels like a massive downgrade.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It depends on how much separation you need. If you want different bookmarks, history, or settings per, then I believe you need profiles to make that happen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (6 children)

You can use containers all you want, just don't create another profile and you're golden.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The screeshots shows functionality that the current profile/profile launch UI already has. Choose, create, ask on startup.

Right now it's hidden behind a startup parameter. But honestly, I would prefer a UI between the current one and the new one. That screenshot looks like it would reduce usability through big spacing and suboptimal alignment. At least judging by my preferences.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/profile-manager-create-remove-switch-firefox-profiles?redirectslug=profile-manager-create-and-remove-firefox-profiles&redirectlocale=en-US#w_start-the-profile-manager-when-firefox-is-closed

I guess adding a picture is nice. But does it have to be that huge and prominent?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

This only works on Windows. For Macs and maybe Linux, you have to run this command to bring up a different profile:

/Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox -p

As best I can tell, there's no way to make this into a shortcut that you could just click on. This change will be good and allow me to launch them without invoking that command in terminal several times after rebooting my computer.

[–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In Windows it's the same. Though the parameter is -P (uppercase) not -p. That's why the comment said "it’s hidden behind a startup parameter".

As best I can tell, there’s no way to make this into a shortcut that you could just click on.

I dont know about Mac, but in Linux you can just manually make a .desktop file to have as a shortcut to call firefox -P, or better a shortcut to a specific profile with firefox -P <profile>. Though what I often do is keep a bookmark to about:profiles and open a new window from there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Uhm ... is this perhaps for the android browser then?

The desktop browser has had this for a long long time, though in recent builds a bit hidden. I still use various profiles, very handy.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

No, this is to make the desktop browser profiles work more like Chrome.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Why would I use this when I have Firefox containers?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

separate settings, separate addons, separate about prefs. also for when the PC is used by more than one person but there is only one user account

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's the same as about:profiles

Just an easy way to separate people's browsing histories, cookes, bookmarks, etc I guess. And you can have them sync independently as well. For if other people want to use the same computer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's great having a separate profile for when you tell bbc iPlayer you have a tv licence.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This should have been a feature 10 years ago

[–] alastel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

One thing that I wonder is if I can convert my old firefox -P profiles into this new kind of profiles, and have them all be synced by firefox with a single account instead of recreating them on all my devices. On the filesystem they seem to be the same, just not in the same place.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I find multi account containers to be the best workflow ergonomics when it comes to separating logins and sessions. I think having the same bookmarks, theme, etc. is actually nice. But I’m sure many really enjoy profile swapping.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

profiles also allow different addons and addon configurations, default fonts, browser config, etc… it’s kinda like having a whole other user account or a whole other copy of the browser, rather than just cookie and storage isolation

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Ironically, in the article it's pictured running on Windows, which now has a built-in mechanic for automatically screen shotting everything you do and keeping records.

Yay.

[–] Meowie_Gamer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

took em long enough.

[–] TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

I wish there was a feature like this on YouTube. I'd love a profile for watching educational videos, a profile for feeding me cool videos when I'm high, and a profile for when my kids want to watch stuff. I'm tired of vibing and listening to music videos only to get hit with a language learning podcast or Disney songs.

It's insane that they have an incognito mode that still serves up ads even though I have premium.

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You can create different accounts under different email addresses.

Once you're logged in, you can switch between accounts from the dropdown menu.

I've done this in the past to separate French YouTube recs from English ones.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›