this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
355 points (93.6% liked)

Technology

74407 readers
2958 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I KNEW THOSE SHORTS I'VE BEEN WATCHING HAD THE "AI LOOK" GOD-DAMNIT! With the smooth faces and the weird plastic looking contrast.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a great way to make money. Pay extra to opt out of AI enhancement!

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

there might be a few youtubers or purists who would pay to opt out of something like that, but the average uploader isn't gonna give two shits about enhancements youtube makes. especially when it took this long for a few people to even notice.

[–] zeropointone@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I know. Not even one percent of the population can see and hear the difference. Most people can't even tell what's human-made and what's AI slop.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say people are incapable of noticing the difference. most people just don't care as much as a very vocal minority of the population seems to. especially people watching shorts. nobody watching shorts is looking for quality, they're looking for short videos that don't outlast their attention span. it doesn't matter whether or not something is AI, all that matters is it engages them for ten seconds or so till they scroll to the next short, and keeps the dopamine flowing.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 18 hours ago

Tbh, I kind of just thought people were uploading worse quality videos to Shorts, or people's phones were doing some bullshit smoothing filter. I didn't realize it until I watched a creator I know who wouldn't upload such an uncanny video filter.

YouTube doing this without telling anyone is kinda crazy. There's a few people who've been complaining their own shorts don't even look like them

[–] basiclemmon98@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, youtube is not even intended to host quality content anymore, but besides that, this appears to just be visual tweaks. This title is trying to be vague enough that one could assume it's tweaking the content itself which would be of real concern. It's not doing that (for now). Video graphics seems like an awefully minor thing to be screaming about AI over. Especially when AI has actual reprocussions in the knowledge accuracy sector.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone -2 points 13 hours ago

Counterpoint: no they couldn’t.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›