this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
328 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

74407 readers
3167 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 51 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Ya! Let them watch all that violence on Netflix instead!

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago

Seriously though. We'll legislate anything to keep them from seeing stuff they might reasonably expect to see and do one day and glorify things nobody should ever see or experience in person.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, is the next step to ban games like Free Fire, Counter Strike etc.?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 42 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's just all these children with their bank accounts paying for their VPN subscriptions doing it all... Do they think we're that stupid? Don't answer that. 😔

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It's the free VPNs that are the problem. They are privacy nightmares.

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If only there was some way the government could have predicted this would happen and maybe not rushed a poorly thought out law in the first place!

maybe then they would not have:

  • forced big tech companies to withdraw service to the uk
  • forced uk-based small forums and message boards to close
  • given free vpn providers tons more data to sell
  • reduced the overall cyber resilience of the country by forcing people to choose between giving photos of their passports to some weird online service or signing up for a free vpn which sells their data, may inject their own unregulated adverts etc
  • reduced uk based advertising effectiveness and thus investment and marketing spend
  • pissed everyone off while doing it, scoring yet another win for the far right

absolute roasters the lot of them

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Well, hold your beer because Brazil is just passing a similar law at this moment. Expect other countries to follow.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Which is worse, the free VPNs or the UK government?

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 6 points 20 hours ago

I mean I don't think I could pick right now 😂

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 36 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

Everyone’s scared of Reform getting in and yet Reform are the only ones promising to reverse all this. All this is done based off the back of a 2016 survey where parents said they were worried about kids watching porn on the internet, but the survey gave no indication of what a solution would look like and gave no mention to online age verification and banning VPNs.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

If I had a nickle for ever time the UK did something pants-on-head stupid or short-sighted from a minor survey or public poll, [counts change jar]... How much are big macs these days?

[–] TwigletSparkle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Naich@lemmings.world -5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Wow that doesn't look shady at all.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Are you serious? It's real and lead by the only two sane people left in British politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately amongst the unwashed masses of the British public this bill isnt actually particularly unpopular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com -1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Why are people scared of reform getting in?

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Racism, homophobia & sexism mostly, but I’m sure I’m missing a few.

Then again the other mayor parties haven’t been saints on the matter, tldr don’t trust a politician.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 7 points 21 hours ago

Because they are a bunch of idiot racist grifters. And those are their good points.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago

Banning Pornhub makes them use the VPNs in the first place.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 25 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Let's say they do. So people start using non UK VPNs. So you need age verification for any Internet access? For any computer or phone that could connect to the Internet?

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 40 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

That's what they're aiming for, yes.

They want to know where everyone is and what every person is doing at every possible moment of every day, be that in public or on the Internet. They are paranoid and know that their entire system is in danger of collapse with the common man gaining control over the rich and powerful.

Thus they resort to extreme control of the commoners to ensure that won't happen.

Child protection and anti-pornography stances are perfect excuses because they're very difficult to argue against.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Every time some new measure is released "for protection", the next day it's being used to sniff out dissidents. That usually means journalists, activists (political, labor, environment, ...) and sympathisants to give them a bit of pressure to straight up arrest them on some pretense.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

difficult to argue against.

Well, except for this one.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

and here we have the heart of the issue, and their end goal. identification required for Internet access. total control.

100% and as always they boil it down to "well even if all that other stuff is true, it's for the safety of children."

Yet we have fucking confirmation that exposing networks of wealthy and powerful pedophiles is not on the agenda. Those people are untouchable. Those people are also the ones that we are handing complete control over to.

So who tf are we really protecting children from by doing this?

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So you need age verification for any Internet access? For any computer or phone that could connect to the Internet?

I mean, experts have said for a while that if you’re going to require age verification, doing it directly on the device would be the most secure way. Allow parents to verify their phones, while creating child accounts for their kids.

When the site needs to verify their age, it simply asks the device directly if the user account is age-verified. It all happens in the background, so the adults never even need to bother with it once it’s set up.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

That makes sense. And seems like it would have much easier implementation as well.

Don't parental controls exist for a reason? Can't you just block VPN use on individual devices like an additional parental control rather than making everyone that uses a VPN prove they're not a child?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 19 hours ago

Watch them get Halloween masks to make them look like grammar just so they can automatically get recognized into the good stuff... BDSM burrito spiroasting. When I was a kid I kept a matchbox that I found on the streets. It was this awesome woman with the best looking naturally inspired gigantic breasts from Dick's last resort. Who ever dropped those, thanks man, you made my member at least 1/4" taller. At least. I don't know what the effects are to be honest.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›