this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
146 points (98.7% liked)

politics

25887 readers
2568 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ocasio-Cortez raised nearly $15 million total in the first half of 2025 from 736,000 contributions, an average of $20 a donor. Notably, her fundraising spiked after the March announcement that she would join Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’ national “Fighting Oligarchy” tour.

So, here's the problem. $15M is a lot of money to a schlub. But it's not a lot to a billionaire.

Michael Bloomberg went through a cool $1B out of his own pocket over 100 days to place 4th in the 2020 Dem Primary. Then he turned around and dropped another $150M into liberal-aligned PACs and campaigns going into the general. In 2024, he dropped $20M into various House races and another $10M into House Majority PAC just in May. This, while his Republican peer Timmothy Mellon injected another $200M into various races, primarily through the Trump SuperPAC.

AOC's fundraising would have been admirable in any election cycle, as an individual. But she's still a small fish in an enormous pond when it comes to billionaire spending. And that's long before we get to the degree of influence a guy like Bloomberg or Bezos or Murdoch wields when they flat out own entire news networks.

If you're wondering why AOC can't get the time of day when she's angling for a committee chairmanship, despite being the third largest fundraiser in the House, that's why. Her haul pales beside what a plutocrat roosting in Martha's Vineyard or Silicon Valley can crap out on a whim.

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It’s so depressing how money influences politics, every citizen should be able to donate $10 a year, and that’s it. No corporate money no PACs, you want to get your message out, you need to actually engage with your constituents on a personal level and earn their support.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Have you heard of the Heritage Foundation?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At give or take 330 million Americans, that'd be about 3 billion dollars, give or take.

A single billionaire could donate double that and just buy the elections

Currently this is perfectly legal in the US, with great thanks to the Republican party which had been sabotaging the country for the past 5 decades.

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yup - so anyone donating more than $10 a year gets 10 years in prison. Also your £10 is 100% tax deductible, if you don’t earn enough to pay any tax then you get an extra $10 in state benefit if you donate it to someone running for office.

Wouldn’t it be nice for campaign funds to be used for shoe leather, emails and flyers, rather than attack ads on every website and TV station.

at some point you have to realise that the political system is corrupt and money needs to be removed, or you’re only doing what about 100 people want, instead of the 330 million.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Trump threatening the blue state with invasion has made fund raising moot. The blue states need to activate their guard units and prepare for what is next.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

It's the Govenors that do that part.

Everyone needs to be doing their part, but one group not doesn't mean everyone else should stop what they're doing.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

. . . Labor day?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is building a fundraising juggernaut that is rivaling some of the Democratic Party’s core infrastructure, prompting questions about both her future and the party’s.

The media is trying to frame this as fighting the party, but this is the DNC working with progressisves

Small-dollar donations – contributions of less than $200 – are the lifeblood of campaigns and a key measure of voter enthusiasm. And on ActBlue, Democrats’ largest online fundraising platform, the New York congresswoman received the third-most small-dollar donations in the first half of the year.

That trailed only the Democratic National Committee and the party’s Senate campaign arm, key party infrastructure. Ocasio-Cortez beat the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the House campaign arm, and every other individual candidate.

DNC is also up because of small donors...

And they're using that to reinvest in red/purple state parties, who are using it to bring Sanders and AOC on their "Fighting Oligarchy" tour to those states

Ocasio-Cortez raised nearly $15 million total in the first half of 2025 from 736,000 contributions, an average of $20 a donor. Notably, her fundraising spiked after the March announcement that she would join Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’ national “Fighting Oligarchy” tour.

It's a feedback loop, and it's intentional. This is how we're supposed to run a party

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep. I am appreciative of your moderate perspective. It's not business as usual but every sign points to that Americans haven't given up on democracy just yet.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep. I am appreciative of your moderate perspective

Lol

It’s not business as usual but every sign points to that Americans haven’t given up on democracy just yet.

Is there like an autocorrect thing going on here?

Cuz it sounds like you're implying that the best result is for Americans to give up on democracy...

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Nope, but I'm worried about that risk becoming realized. Americans are now living in an authoritarian country, but with enough effort and resolve from Americans there still appears hope for a way back out. There is a lot of nihilism abound, but I'm commending you for bring forth the idea that it's not irreversible.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Was it by spamming everyone’s phones with SMS donation requests? I bet it wasn’t.