this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
763 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

74599 readers
4033 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (5 children)

They're gonna try to break everything so AI looks competent, because they can't make AI competent...

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This has nothing to do with AI and everything to do with their fascist attempts to rewrite history

[–] lemmysquezzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

👆 mm hmm

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 14 points 1 day ago

Maybe the AI doomers are right.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

One recent report raised troubling questions about potentially systematic efforts to advance antisemitic and anti-Israel information in Wikipedia articles related to conflicts with the State of Israel.

Of course they'd use the anti-Israel crutch.

Why not? Fascists hate nothing more than truth.

FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

Our ace in the hole is history, we know already how this story ends. Stop letting them turn the damn pages.

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su -2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (10 children)

Not bias, but I was surprised to find out how Wikipedia is censoring information surrounding ChrisChan.

All of the articles mentioning him in English just say he's an internet personality, and his English Wikipedia page has been removed.

That kind of censorship doesn't sit will with me. What else are they keeping from us?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Smackyroon@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Twas but a matter of time

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 day ago

Well, silver lining is now liberals might actually check to see if Wikipedia is getting it's claims from right wing pundits.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›