I don't read French unfortunately and I refuse to use AI.
doug Ford is a universal ass
And a private company CEO?
I was looking for federal politicians that's promised to learn French, since that's what the NDP are.
I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but I can't remember any on the national stage. But I'd be the last to remember, hence me asking.
Solar flares come and go in ~11 year cycles. So strong solar flares are common now (we've had a few this past year) but go dormant for a while at a time.
Is your country also having a fascist problem?
Because those two things seems to be correlated.
Where I'm from hate speech is (rightly) a crime. Because calling for the death (of let's make an example of my trans siblings) of a people is still violence.
No, that's not what makes you a contrarian.
What does is coming into the ONE there's, leaving a counter opinion, and then calling group think when it turns out people disagree with you.
And same to you, remember some people on the internet are autistic and are genuinely this flat in writing.
I'm unsure where the butthurt is coming from.
Yes you are defending it, by saying it's okay.
You should look up the tolerance paradox.
Tl;Dr the ONE thing a tolerant society must be intolerant of is intolerance itself.
I don't care about your opinions on a lot of things. But intolerance of people for inherit traits is the one thing I don't stand for.
Its always amazing how people defend platforming, at best, a white supremacist.
Also, that's fair from the only complaint in that post with receipts.
Just look at other comment chains replied to you.
Your in the one comment chain talking about hating AI, but that's group think?
No, your just a contrarian.
Disclaimer: it's been a decade since I did my undergrad in physics.
Its called entanglement. Meaning two things are quantum linked to be the same state. In this case the dots. This is done without any physical link between them. That's what makes this teleportation.
So what happens is both sides are in a quantum state where each dot is both 0 and 1. But importantly when measured they will produce the same result. The other effect is what you do to one dot, you do to both.
This is where I get fuzzy.
The idea here is to have one dot in the computer and one dot to observe outside. You do the physics in the computer to compute the result, then observe the dot outside to see the result.
You keep acting like your comment exists in a vacuum. It just simply doesn't.
You also need to see how this looks to everyone else.
You come in here, and just spew a right wing "both sides" comment. Knowingly or not, that's what you did. And you expect to not be pushed back against that?
You keep saying that's not your intent, when frankly, that doesn't matter. You don't get to determine how your comment gets interpreted. Because it's not your mind that's doing it. Just like artists, your speech is no longer yours to control once said.
So I'm not American, I'm Canadian.
Your entire comment reads liek that one comic "ahhh but you participate in society I'm so smart".
No one is arguing what you said to be true or not. If it's that's simple, then was it wasn't really going to spark discussion. Did you really just intend to make a dead end statement?
No one is saying you shouldn't speak, it's just none of us want to listen anymore.
Also, to communicate is to interpret. That's just how language works. An artist doesn't get to determine how their work is seen. Its to be interpreted. What you say (and don't) still says alot about you.
Canadians will fucking kill you deader then dead lol