MadhuGururajan

joined 2 years ago

I feel like it is not wise to discard the opinion of a layperson with this reasoning. Sure experts have been working on it as their day job vs. Us just looking at the fruits of their labour. But that doesn't justify the assumption that they are infallible. Don't you agree in our own areas of supposed expertise we are often corrected or get inspiration from supposed laymen simply because we have been too myopic about solving the problem ahead of us?

[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm sure the ML Guys thought of that & tried to prevent it.

Deferring to authority is fine as long as you don't make assumptions about what happened or didn't happen.

brother you're using the wrong thing. First of all you are using crypto that's going to give you some memecoins that are obviously going to collide after 55 hours as what are you even doing not rugpulling the thing day 2?

Second of all, I am pretty sure you should use "RandomUUIDIToldYouSo" module for non-colliding hashes. We all know THAT thing gets its Noise from our parents' instructions on doing a specific thing that keep changing arbitrarily every time you ask.

good thing my gmail is full of spammy bullshit.

Wait how did you identify it's LLM generated? Was it the repetition of the headline in the post body?

staging sucks anyway. Never catches bugs.

[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

you say that but they're already thinking a step ahead and assuming meta left a backdoor or CVE at the behest of 3-letter agencies.

What's facebook's business plan? Right, surveillance capitalism.

[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

My understanding so far is:

if business logic assumes a set of preconditions before a particular piece of code that the language/runtime/os satisfies.. then it's an immediate assert. Any kind of IO, memory creation and OS operations fall into this carefory.

However if the business logic assumes something in its own domain and that assumption does not hold then its better to handle that instead of crashing. Ex. being you expect a queue to have at least one element in some pipeline and if it is empty then return saying nothing to be done.

Edit: don't assert/crash if your application is single process multithreaded unless you want your friend from accounting asking you why their stock ticker crashed just when they clicked a button in the coffee shop module of your app. Use some thread exit mechanism.

[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder how it would look with excel sort

or they just place a block of cheese near by as a shelf or counterbalance for the chopping board for the actual ingredients.

[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hey man just because you got a threesome doesn't mean its common.

Spontaneous group happens in real life -> I agree.

All the time -> I don't agree

There are people who seek it out

But that doesn't mean they get it "all the time"

Unfortunately the difference between those two types of people defines the lens through which you define a "naive" person.

And your lens is too much caliberated to view every encounter as an opportunity even if you don't know whether the OP is actually into it or not, thus projecting your expectations into the scenario.

[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev -3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Predators

honestly.. I would be happy to have more people just for the sake of meeting them and having a fun friends day out. Does not need to be a date. We could just hangout.

view more: next ›