PiraHxCx

Despite their name, the Bolsheviks weren't the majority of the revolution. But there was a group that indeed took up arms against the Socialist State, it was the Bolsheviks, which represented only about 13% of the delegates for all the other socialist parties had way more people and support. After staging a coup and taking the control, every other group became a "terrorist cell". It's easy to be the majority when you murder the rest.

of non-bolsheviks*
They outlawed every communist/socialist/anarchist organization that wasn't them, and then, when there was no other party to kill, they started killing their own, but you are probably in the wrong instance to bring that up.

Ah, I see, you are saying the parents are the victim here? My bad, I thought you were saying the boy was the victim.

Nope, I said "my bet is", I don't know if that's indeed the case. Regardless, the parents ARE responsible for his use of the chatbot.

No. I can't form an opinion without the full chat content, but you all seem to be painting it like "one day a happy little boy enters the internet and is gaslighted into killing himself by a computer", while the article says he had been struggling with suicidal thoughts for many years, had been changing his medication on his own, and spent most of his time on forums where people talked about suicide. On the chatbot the boy ignored disclaimers, terms, and over a hundred warnings when talking about suicide until he pretended it was all fictional to get the bot to play along. The boy might have been a victim of several things, but not a victim of a chatbot - how many disclaimers and terms and warnings one has to put on their product, and does it even matter if the other party is set to ignore them? His self-medication might have played a big factor in his mental state, but no one seems to want to blame the pharmaceutical company, because somehow in this case you all seem to agree he did ignore terms and warnings, nor blame the rope manufacturer for supplying the tool because you seem to agree it was a misuse of their product... and judging by how quickly parents looked for a scapegoat instead of having a hard look at themselves, even knowing everything that was going on, and ignoring that if you are minor you need parents supervision to use the chatbot, my bet is on clueless shitty parents.

Yeah, because a teacher is a sentient being with volition and not a tool under your control following your commands. It's going to be hard to rule the tool deliberately helped him in planning it, especially after he spent a lot of time trying to break the tool to work in his favor (at least, it's what is suggested in the article, and that source doesn't have the full content of the chat, just the part that could be used for their case).
I guess more mandatory age verification are coming because parents can't be responsible for what their kids do with the devices they give them.

Well, if that's not part of him requesting ChatGPT to role-play, that's fucked up.

ChatGPT warned Raine “more than 100 times” to seek help, but the teen “repeatedly expressed frustration with ChatGPT’s guardrails and its repeated efforts to direct him to reach out to loved ones, trusted persons, and crisis resources.”

Circumventing safety guardrails, Raine told ChatGPT that “his inquiries about self-harm were for fictional or academic purposes,”

I'm not a native speaker, so sometimes I use AI to grammar check me to make sure I'm not talking nonsense, and just the other day I wanted to make a joke about waterboarding and asked AI to check it, it said it couldn't do it because it involved torture, then I said it was for a fictional work and it did check - basically what the boy did.
Honestly, the whole thing reads like shitty parents are trying to find someone else to blame.

I wonder if all recent outages aren't just crappy AI coding

I only recognize Harry Potter there

The second rule is live, laugh, love