erin

Intelligence is an inherited trait?

My only complaint is that "femcel" has largely been reclaimed and repurposed from the incel movement to an ironic label mostly used by queer women.

Some may. Others make art. Generalizing artists as a monolith is irresponsible.

It's a culture thing. A majority queer group hanging out vs a majority non-queer group is a totally different vibe, to the point that like the original post, it feels weird to me to hang out with a bunch of straight people, as the slang, mannerisms, and social code are just totally different. As the other commenter said, neurodivergent people are also more likely to question other aspects of their identity, so there is a lot of overlap between the two groups as well.

Could not disagree more. Nudes don't have to be "jerk of material." That's not why my partners and I send them to each other. They're more for mutual appreciation. We like looking at each other's bodies because we're attracted to each other, not because we're expecting to rub one out. Also, sounds like you/the people you share nudes with need to take better nudes lol. We take excellent photos with excellent lighting (when the mood strikes us). Taking a "photo of your gooch" from the same angle is the woman equivalent of the right side of the meme. We all should know better.

Pose, angle, and lighting, people!

If that seems good to you, please stay out of education. Also, I'm not your friend, please don't call me that. It's patronizing. I brought it up because it was relevant to my greater point and was an amusing anecdote about the wrong way to teach dated literature, not because I'm still stuck on a minor event a decade ago. I've had far worse experiences with teachers that actually were formative, in the sense that they were traumatic. Traumatizing kids isn't "pushing them," it's just hurting them in their formative years. That teacher didn't traumatize me, but for someone less confident socially or in their opinions, it easily could have been. Imagine forcing a shy, neurodivergent kid to argue against 20+ other people for 45 minutes about something as divisive as human nature and morality, while simultaneously shutting down any discussion of the author's racism, which is very relevant to that discussion. That teacher didn't know me at all. That could've been me.

Well, I'm glad you have a such a broad picture of my psychology from a one off Internet comment about an event that I hadn't thought about in years. It didn't make me who I am, the people I chose to spend time with and the excellent teachers that taught me did. Encouraging a lopsided debate about a topic where even discussing the racist bias isn't allowed is not something that teacher did to help teach or form me.

When Piggy drops racial slurs in reference to the barbaric behavior of the other boys. Essentially, "We're white! We're better than this. Stop acting like [slur]."

My problem is not with reading something I disagree with, it's how it is taught. It was not taught in a way to demonstrate bias, and the author's views were never even discussed. There was nearly no critical discussion about the validity of the book's message, it was taken at face value. That's not teaching.

The majority certainly doesn't choose the active misery of others, and on the scale of the Lord of the Flies setting, humans have consistently shown collaboration and mutual aid. We've documented many instances of stranded groups, and even some people that volunteered to be stuck on a raft together for months, and they always choose to work together, despite their differences. Capitalism, fascism, and radical individualism/nationalism are the root of the societal scale evils, because they're ideologies that propagate in the hands of the few that are willing to benefit at the cost of the many. Humans have not always lived under capitalism.

Intelligent, compassionate, and a vessel for the author's racist worldview.

Don't mind me. I hate that book, and I hate that it's taught in every school as if it has anything important to say. We've run the Lord of the Flies experiment, both accidentally and very intentionally. Every time, we've demonstrated that humans are better than that, and the author's beliefs about human nature were both very incorrect and very racist.

I still resent being forced to debate my classmates about whether human nature was intrinsically "good" or "evil," directly after reading that book, even though it was 25 years ago. I was the lone voice on the side of "good," for lack of a "good and evil are subjective terms, but nonetheless humans are empathetic and this book is horseshit" team. I got dogpiled by 20 some other students for about 45 minutes. Fuck you Ms. Brown, and fuck you William Golding. That book has nothing important to say other than exposing its author's racist insecurities.