When did I say it's okay? I just said this is nothing new, it's not an anomaly. You should be outraged, but don't act like a for-profit company isn't going to chase profit incentives, and if they are incentivized to sensationalize, they're going to sensationalize. If they end up making more money from an outright lie after any litigation, they'll tell a lie.
fantasyocean
joined 8 months ago
Why would anyone do that when you can just complain about needing change, but do absolutely nothing to support or advocate for it! Or better yet, you can just start applying uninformed purity tests to progressive candidates. "She wants to implement the change I want to see, but because I don't understand how legislation is passed in the US, I'll accuse her of giving money to Israel's occupation, and say she's complicit in genocide" - average internet leftist.
It's all good, I thought we were just yapping
Unlike a professor who would reject a student's unsubstantiated claims, a for-profit entity won't care about evidence unless its absence hurts profits. And you can say that about nearly any commercial news or journalistic organization. Establishing an equitable and high standard of education is the only true way to combat this, and that's not happening in our lifetime
I guess, but inflammatory and sensationalist headlines have always existed.
If said reporter can't present quantifiable data/evidence, then maybe they shouldn't write the article?
Hear me out, I wouldn't mind if Google did the same thing with YouTube. That way all the ai slop would be in one feed I can ignore and I can just go back to watching gunpla build videos on autoplay.