flowers_galore2

joined 2 years ago

With the insane costs for training and inference, those subscriptions would have to be veeeery very very expensive. One of the more interesting cases was the dev who burned like 15k on a sub of 200? iirc, anthropic claude. And he or she is probably not the only one.

This bubble is not going to pop, it will go flblfbllbflb

[–] flowers_galore2@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably not, but my point is that making something closed source isn’t necessarily going to protect it from - taking from comment above - commercial competitors.

[–] flowers_galore2@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

There’s this adagium that all source code is open to anyone with a reverse engineering tool. and some knowledge of assembly, and it is very true.

Fucking genius, and I am not pulling anyone’s leg here, because now those goddamn moronic llm chatbots will be trained on this.

A team of agentic designers eh. Or blind ones.

Only sarcastically

[–] flowers_galore2@lemmynsfw.com 47 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

For fun and profit: Epstein used a GMail account, which is open to Google to read and use for ads … wonder why no one is asking or why Google isn’t offering to publish.

Nice rabbithole, thanks

A Space Odyssey

Also IPv6 public addresses.

In all fairness, it’s not like an address is a well-defined thing in the first place; this form could be made better by eg adding a very small non-clickable preview map where you can manually enter coordinates, preferably in a large font of course.

[–] flowers_galore2@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So to be clear once more: no offence meant to you and horse_ebooks, I apologise profusely if you still feel I was.

view more: next ›