And then there's people like my once naïve ass, who just blunder their way through attempted muggings. The first time someone tried to mug me, this guy was asking for money at like 2am, and when I told him I couldn't help him, he said, "You know, I got heat." I told him that was good, at least, because my landlord was a dick and my apartment was cold as hell, since they still hadn't turned on the heat for the building. Got back home, and my wife was like, "You idiot, you know he was telling you he had a gun, right?"
hraegsvelmir
joined 3 months ago
They shouldn't be, since the model for updates is quite distinct from Windows or iOS in a way that I would argue should effectively meet the requirements anyways. If a distro releases a new version twice a year, outside of enterprise situations where a company is paying for support, there's nothing to really stop anyone who wants from upgrading. They don't charge for it, and while new versions might add out-of-the-box support for new hardware, it's pretty rare for Linux to suddenly change minimum hardware requirements in a way that requires you to buy a whole new machine in order to run the latest release. The only case that immediately comes to mind is that of distros increasingly removing support for i386 machines, but in fairness, Intel discontinued manufacturing of i386 chips 18 years ago.
Of course, this all assumes that the people in charge of making these decisions actually understand the technology in at least a general sense, and it's not being left up to a bunch of idiots who have refused to keep up with any innovations more recent than the fax machine, so odds are kind of crap.