mistermodal

joined 2 months ago
[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Of course, but it would be better if you tried to break down why you think this is the guy first. Not being glib. Why do you think it's him? What information led you to that conclusion?

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You must be really enjoying the new status quo of documents related to these trials being leaked to manipulate public opinion.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Well I'm glad the document is convincing enough that you don't need any evidence this guy was in the same state as the murder at the time.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago

It's ridiculous that you would run with some document leaked to a freelance journalist to the degree you overlook feds have provided zero evidence this guy was even in the state at the time of the murder. The handling of this trial has been disgusting, on the side of the public as well as the prosecution. It's downright shameful.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Because it's not shiny and new? I think the simple stuff works great with the shiny stuff. Command line tools are great for weaving in NTFY pings to our fancy pocket communicators with all kinds of information.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I think there may be a little bit more to the relationship between the USA and its protectorates than bribery, if you've got the time to listen.

view more: ‹ prev next ›