passenger

joined 6 months ago
[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess to avoid algorithms hiding the post?

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the additional digging.

Is it totally open source? Because I am not suited to verify this - I can only see that at some point it was not open source while claiming to be, and relied on binary blobs. Their server side code? Cannot know what is in there (of course). Running your own server? Cannot really vet the code either, so until it becomes still more popular I cannot trust it yet.

I mean, it is probably fine, I hope it is.

They have scrubbed Zhou from the company info page. They were listed as founder before among the two other people (who may or may not be real - this is another question mark I saw). This scrubbing could, of course be non nefarious. But I think this could have and should have been communicated better.

But instead they seem to shut down discussion: https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/discussions/1159#discussioncomment-3312105

None of this has to mean anything much but I personally will continue with paid options still for now and keep hoping rd would turn out alright!

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Chinese company profile

https://tracxn.com/d/companies/rustdesk/__hVv0PUAcFB2LfybEPDvvPkJf14Mc7PfmkSGfqXkYxsg

News piece about them

https://inf.news/en/tech/b99963560cecae8e1dfe347c68e36ff8.html

None of this means much else than that I will not use it myself, at least yet. I don't trust it

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It doesn't need to be, I just won't go near it if they communicate like this and do stuff like change their users' system settings without prompting. You can do a search for rustdesk controversy and have a look yourself. Just looking at how they hide the company's chinese origins and their communication style when they are asked for clarification... That's enough for me. Everyone should be paranoid when installing apps, and this is for remote control, no less.

Edit 2: see also their claims of open source while people could not compile a working version without a pre compiled binary blob. Maybe they fixed that? Or not?

Edit: I want to add, I want an open source software like that, I hope they would turn up good. Just going to watch from over here.

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

It seems they were trying to hide the app being Chinese, added a trusted certificate on your machine without prompting, complaints about not really being open source, etc. It doesn't look very good to me at this point.

Search around a bit and you will find these issues being raised by people, at the same time the answers fron the team seem very dismissive and amount to "please no politics here".

Check the wikipedia page edits as well, weird stuff. I don't like weird stuff when choosing a remote control software.

Rather paying Anydesk than using this. At this point at least.

Edit: to add, rustdesk was using and sending data to a chinese server for some reason. At least they got an EU one instead, at least according to wikipedia, but that could just resend whatever data forward. This is all just what I see on the net though. But, enough for me to choose something else.

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I would not touch it, seems very sketchy, and with this sort of program you need total trust

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is the way to go!

X is not a good look, it is ******* cringe to see governmental entities still using it around the world.

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Truecrypt is followed by VeraCrypt which is now the standard. Don't use TrueCrypt

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't forget the diarrhea drinking. How would he otherwise stay throat goat? (Grok said this)

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Use duplicati, or if you want command line, use borg.

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

To me it sounds horrible, unergonomical, full of distractions if in the public...

But yeah it's mostly funny how he hates it.

Do what u want!

 

I would like some ideas or suggestions as I am not sure how to continue with self hosting.

I want to self host images and caldav, maybe documents later as well. These would need to be continuously available to PC clients and Android. There would be a handful of users maximum.

The obvious (?) solution would be Nextcloud, which would do everything I need.

My problem is that I have only one public IP address and the HTTP and HTTPS ports are already in use by Apache.

The second problem is that I already use wireguard to another location, and Android cannot connect simultaneously to several wireguard endpoints. At least as far as I know.

Below, I list the approaches I have considered and the problems / drawbacks I see.

Please comment if I am wrong about something here.

At the moment I am looking at option 4.

Any comments are welcome!

Option 1. Nextcloud AIO publicly available through HTTPS

It needs the HTTP & HTTPS ports which are in use. Otherwise, this would be the go-to for me.

Option 2. Nextcloud AIO through wireguard

I would have to switch between two wireguard instances on Android. There would probably be continuous connection errors and sync problems on apps that try to connect to either location (nextcloud and davx5 for example).

Setup would be a bit compilated for me. AFAIK, I would have to set up a local DNS, self made certificates and a reverse proxy for the Apache server.

Setup would be complicated for all other users as well and require wireguard and manually installed certificates.

Option 3. Nextcloud AIO with tailscale

Setup complicated like #2 and then some?

I have no idea if it works while using the android wireguard app for the other connection I need.

Option 4. Radicale and Ente publicly available

As far as I know, these run on special ports that are not 80 or 443.

Server setup would be slightly complicated.

Client setup would be simple.

Document sync I would have to figure out later (maybe just syncthing or otter setup?).

view more: next ›