Is it disabled in hardware, firmware or software? Does Linux enable it?
tangeli
It's an interesting article but it seems to me that when it comes to opposing abuse of power, free communication is more fundamental than free software. Without sufficiently free communication, free software is practically unavailable and for many purposes (anything that involves communication with others) it is unusable. Without sufficiently free means of communication, the fediverse will cease to exist. Access to and use of the Internet is increasingly regulated.
According to Are Song Lyrics Copyrighted? How the Law Works, unless their use is 'fair use' or they have a license, then they are violating copyright, if I understand the article correctly. I believe that site explains laws in the United States. It probably varies somewhat by jurisdiction, so I expect it would depend on who owns the website and where they are based.
Is ChatGPT a legal entity competent to violate copyright law? I don't think that's likely.
I do think OpenAI violated copyright law by copying song lyrics and other media to use them as input to their LLM systems, to embed the essence of them into their LLMs for commercial benefit. Judging by the valuations of the companies that do not yet have significant income compared to the investments, on the face of it, the IP they copied, often without license, as far as I know, is fantastically valuable.
I'm not running your configuration so can't tell you with the assurance that I have it working but Forwarding ports with firewalld appears to address port forwarding to rootless podman using firewalld. If that doesn't work for you you might need to clarify what your firewalld configuration is that obscures the client IP. I wouldn't expect a simple port mapping to affect IP address.
What happened to "A rising tide lifts all boats"?
They may accept the ongoing cost, but that doesn't make it free. There may be no cash payment, but that doesn't make it free. Cost comes in many forms. The glib misrepresentation of the transaction is disappointing.
If it's a US company, it's not sovereign for any country other than USA. In any other country, it's US spyware and theft of intellectual property, from a moral perspective if not a corrupt legal perspective.
Can they be made into finished lumber in Canada at a cost that would allow them to sell for a profit into export markets? What would it take to achieve this?