zaknenou

joined 2 years ago
[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I tried to discuss with ChatGPT and he suggested:

The San (Bushmen) of southern Africa believed in a creator deity and spirits of the dead.

Does this work as a counter example ?

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

You know, you're clearly spreading hate with this comment, there is nothing I can answer, this comment is straight up dogma.

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

hmm, idk, okay.

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

idk, it seems to have described so much about the universe with so few input. And can just study itself like in "Gödel's incompleteness theorems" to give constraints on what you aspire to achieve with it. I'd call math/logic/reason fairly strong by themselves.

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Libraries are underrated, no matter the society you look at. I remember a post from reddit that mentioned that it can help you if your life is being targeted or something like that.

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

they have to. science keeps painting ‘god’ into a smaller and smaller corner every day.

I feel like I know who you're quoting, and I remember encountering: https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-debate-hawkings-idea-that-the-universe-had-no-beginning-20190606/
to quote the part that appeals to me:

In their 2017 paper (opens a new tab), published in Physical Review Letters, Turok and his co-authors approached Hartle and Hawking’s no-boundary proposal with new mathematical techniques that, in their view, make its predictions much more concrete than before. “We discovered that it just failed miserably,” Turok said. “It was just not possible quantum mechanically for a universe to start in the way they imagined.” The trio checked their math and queried their underlying assumptions before going public, but “unfortunately,” Turok said, “it just seemed to be inescapable that the Hartle-Hawking proposal was a disaster.”

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Under an Islamic rule, the Muslim is forced to do this donation. And Muslim billionaires are not all of a sudden all pious because they have this label. Islamic law doesn't eliminate the need to study politics and sociology you know. Many Muslim scholars, claimed that it could in fact end the poverty in the Islamic world if really all obliged muslims paid their zakat (which is a requirement for Islam, not like a side quest, and should be enforced legally), among them Dr. Abd Al-Rahman bin Hamood Al-Sumait a humanitarian. This might appeal to you?: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/jun/22/zakat-requires-muslims-to-donate-25-of-their-wealth-could-this-end-poverty

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Are you using "Tu Quoque" here? basing on a "Hasty Generalization" I assume ?

If you're basing on Saudi Arabia or UAE, please notice that you're basing on a country that is pro Israel, meaning literally invaded.

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

tossing it to trash would be disrespectful you know. If someone needs it when you don't, you can donate it to them.

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (10 children)

They ask you, [O Muhammad], what they should spend. Say, "Whatever you spend of good is [to be] for parents and relatives and orphans and the needy and the traveler. And whatever you do of good - indeed, Allah is Knowing of it." 1

I know right?

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (16 children)

WHO SOMEHOW NEEDS TEN PERCENT OF MY EARNINGS?

zakat is actually 2.5% of your hoarded (for a whole year) money that exceeds 87.48 grams of gold, given to the poor. Shouldn't that actually be a means to elimination of class ?

view more: ‹ prev next ›