this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
881 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

25864 readers
1149 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm not sure I blame the sites. The spec is so complex that it's not even possible to know which regex to use

[–] bignose@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The spec is so complex that it’s not even possible to know which regex to use

Yes. Almost like a regex is not the correct tool to use, and instead they should use a well-tested library function to validate email addresses.

[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Exactly! But its not obvios. So most of those shitty websites don't even know they have a problem.

Then there are also people ignoring it on purpose. I once read a reddit comment saying 'well of your address looks like "John wick 🐶❤️"@2001:0db8:85a3:0000:0000:8a2e:0370:7334 I don't event want your email in my DB because oit will break something

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's one very random place to find that. There are a lot of different one and there is no way we all just agree to use that one.

Look art his site that shows a more complete and (in theory) official website. While also explaining that there is no regex that is perfect

https://emailregex.com/

(Compete regex for the lazy)

(?:\[a-z0-9!#$%&'\*+/=?^\_\`{|}\~-]+(?:\\.\[a-z0-9!#$%&'\*+/=?^\_\`{|}\~-]+)\*|"(?:\[\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x21\x23-\x5b\x5d-\x7f]|\\\\\[\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x7f])\*")@(?:(?:\[a-z0-9]\(?:\[a-z0-9-]\*\[a-z0-9])?\\.)+\[a-z0-9]\(?:\[a-z0-9-]\*\[a-z0-9])?|\\\[(?:(?:25\[0-5]|2\[0-4]\[0-9]|\[01]?\[0-9]\[0-9]?)\\.){3}(?:25\[0-5]|2\[0-4]\[0-9]|\[01]?\[0-9]\[0-9]?|\[a-z0-9-]\*\[a-z0-9]:(?:\[\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x21-\x5a\x53-\x7f]|\\\\\[\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x7f])+)\\])
[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

MDN isn't a very random place?

[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

No. But it's on the form validation topic.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago

I have a feeling, the ones codapine is stating, didn't even care to half-read the spec and just went with what they knew from experience.
Maybe they didn't even know there was a spec.
Maybe they asked ChatGPT for the regex.