this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
625 points (98.9% liked)

politics

25875 readers
3365 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So we've reached the minorities-flee-the-country stage.

That was fast. It's getting Nazier by the minute in this motherfucker...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

also cracking down on immigration

That's a false equivalence.
What USA is doing is beyond cracking down on immigration, USA is using Gestapo methods, rounding up people who are in USA legally, and the detained are not allowed to see a judge. It's completely outside the rules of the American constitution.

Huge difference from using legal means of deporting illegal immigrants, where they have a lawyer and a court decides according to the law of the land.

One is fascist methods, the other is not.

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True, though it still makes it harder for my sister to seek asylum when they are cracking down on immigration, no? I didn't mean to imply that they are equivalent. Of course America is much, much worse.

However, since Canada also seems to be turning right, it'll more so be a move to delay the inevitable even if she is able to seek asylum. It'd be better than staying here at least, assuming America doesn't invade Canada for Lebensraum within 4 years.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Asylum and immigration are two different things.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't see that's relevant to OP's question.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Then you are blind. I'm pointing out a false equivalence in the comment I responded to. But since apparently it's possible not to be able to see that, I have now added it to my comment.

So the relevance is that Canada should not be excluded. Almost all industrialized countries are limiting immigration, but you can still seek asylum.

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

bill c2 is about to be passed, and its abhorrent, even to asylum seekers. look it up.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social -1 points 1 week ago

I don't think it's a false equivalence. The US is further along, but look at what is going on in other western nations and it's the same deal. Denying that just because the US is worse will only ensure it happens other places soon