this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
1250 points (96.7% liked)

Flippanarchy

1632 readers
400 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 57 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] original_charles@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (6 children)

85 being illiterate seems high

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 1 week ago

I have some really bad news for you about the literacy rate in the U.S.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] sharkteethsandwich@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unfortunately this is accurate. Half of adults in the US are unable to read past a sixth grade level. 20% are functionally illiterate.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/us-literacy-rates-by-state

[–] Chev@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How is that possible? People use the internet every day where you need to read constantly. Do those people live without any internet?

I have met people who couldn't read who used their phones. It's made for a literal infant child to use.

If you look at the data, it tells you about 1/3 of those who are illiterate comes from foreigners so that is not surprising. But the largest demographic of illiterates in the US is white people lol

Also they are functionally illiterate. It's a wide encompassing term that ranges from people who can't read English because they just moved here to people who can only read basic words like stop and go or words they encounter often in life but not much more than that.

I would imagine many people who are functionally illiterate just go to work, watch tv, and sleep.

[–] freeman@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 week ago

It's unsurprising if you understand how horrible & scientifically uninformed popular reading pedagogy was until a few years ago. It probably explains the overreliance of meetings at work where written communication should suffice.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

It sadly isn't.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Literacy is pretty strict, for a good reason. You can still be able to read street signs and "See Spot Run" and be considered illiterate.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Only one getting shot per day? Fuckin' rookie numbers!

E: extra word

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That seems high even by US standards. After a year, basically everyone would be dead.

This is flippanarchy not maths-and-precision.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Apparently the rate is 125 killed by a gun and 200 shot and wounded per day. I don't know how that would extrapolate from the total population down to 400 people but you are correct that it is, in fact, much less than one.

https://everytownresearch.org/report/gun-violence-in-america/

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

325 out of 340 million is less than 1 in a million (per day). So in our 400 person room, (assuming I’m doing the math right) about 30-40 grams of human matter would get shot per day. Which is like, four (or more) eyeballs of weight.

I’d be extremely concerned if every single day, a random body part of someone in the room was destroyed.

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Alternately, if you do it by time instead of size, one person gets shot about every seven years.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Of those 125 "killed by a gun", 91 of the "victims" pulled the trigger themselves. There's about 34 gun murders per day in the US.

If you're looking for a population where one person is murdered daily, you need to start with about 10,440,000 people.

The problem isn't that people are killing themselves. The problem is desperation. For far too many in our dystopian society, death is the brightest hope that some will ever see. The solution to gun suicide is unfucking this massive shitstained clusterfuck, not depriving the desperate of their 9mm retirement plans.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why per day? It being trans counted per day?

That number seems quite realistic when considering it as over the course of a life time, i.e. over the course of your life time you have a 1 in 400 chance of being shot.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And everyday, at least 1 person is shot.

It literally says it in the post?

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ok, fine, I overread that, but it still doesn't make sense to compare that on such vastly different time scales.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Dude it's trying to provide emotional clarity relative to statistics not be precise on the math. Also look at OOP's username 'gayblackvet': he probably has a higher than average exposure to gun deaths.

Take it up with @gayblackvet?