this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
485 points (95.2% liked)

politics

25875 readers
3364 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 146 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It's not news. My personal date for the start of dictatorship in the United Stated is March 14, 2025: that's the first instance of Trump and his henchmen disobeying a court decision.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think it was earlier, when the supreme Court ruled that the president could do what he wanted as long as it was part of his duties and THEY get to decide what is part of his duties.

Yes I did say duty. Grow up.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mans be getting his duties all over the constitution

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Thank you for this because I wasn't serious about growing up. Never grow up!

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine not being able to distinguish between the words duty and doody.

  • The English Gang
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well I couldn't write doody, it wouldn't make sense written. Plus I kind of think the kind of people that laugh at the word doodie, may NOT know the difference. Anyway, don't rain on my parade. Trying to lighten the mood.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Apologies for raining on your parade, I was just engaging in a bit of transatlantic ribbing.

(We also don't use the word doody/doodie, so I don't know what it looks like written.)

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Copy that! My friends will attest to the fact that I deserve ribbing, transatlantic or otherwise. It might as well be you.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

IMO it's the day he took power the second time.

As he said plainly, "I'll be a dictator from day one". And then millions of Americans looked at his record, looked at all the crimes he'd been found guilty of, considered his promise, and voted for him anyway.

Real Darwin Award shit.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What amazes me is that no one says he cheated to win like he did the first time. I would be very surprised if we couldn't find some trace years later that we didn't notice.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's just kind of a pointless thing to be mad about at this point, but it was definitely talked about.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think in the first run it was discussed more frequently. That's all.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

There was that whole thing with Elon Musk and those "vote counting computers" in Pennsylvania.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

That's because MAGA claimed Biden cheated for so long and so loudly that people were tired of hearing it and wanted to show they were better than the MAGAs.

As always they accused their opponent of what they were going to do themselves, and it continues to work for them.

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I would trace it back to September 11, 2001 at least. Specifically, the highly authoritarian response to that. There's a direct line from what the US government started doing then to what they're doing now.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 14 points 1 week ago

Yes indeed. Bin Laden can be proud, the terrorists won

The patriot act was being prepared long before 9/11.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It happened November 5th 2024 when he, Elon and Putin stole the election. We've been cooked ever since.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

TBF, this shitball started way back when Reagan sculpted handfuls from his own crack and named it all "policy".

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Shouldn't you be busy putting your case together to show your evidence in court?

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

1832 called and wants to remind you of Worcester v. Georgia. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Worcester-v-Georgia

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

My date is 2014 when a Princeton study concluded that the USA is not a democracy, but an oligarchy.