this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
128 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

74265 readers
4199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artyom@piefed.social 21 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Hard to imagine how they're going to take down deepfakes without limiting freedom of information or how they will prove who made the content.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Similarly, libs hated guns so much, they let the fucking COPS have the right to arbitrarily deny you a gun permit* under so called "may issue" laws.

Yea no fuck that lol. They would just let white people have guns and non-whites seeking a gun for self-defence will be denied because "they look suspicious"

You can never trust the police. Arm yourselved, form a well-regulated militia to protect your community.

*"may issue" laws were in effect in many Democratic jurisdictions until 2022, when, ironically, the fascists on the supreme court struck them down.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

Block chain!

i kid, but it could

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Well they already have a leg up with the TAKE IT DOWN Act that Democrats worked with Ted Cruz and Trump to get passed.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

To my knowledge, that only covers pornographic content.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

And the Patriot Act was only implemented to catch terrorists. What's considered "pornographic content" is entirely subjective and up to the personal feelings of a particular judge.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There's no judge in the world who could make the leap that this is pornographic.

Looks at judges who have decided any sign of support for Palestine is terrorism

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

as a victorian from over a century ago, i find anything depicting unclothed ankles to be porn.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 0 points 13 hours ago