this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
109 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

74073 readers
2887 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago (26 children)

All the people here chastising LLMs for resource wastage, I swear to god if you aren't vegan...

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] stratoscaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is it with vegans and comparing literally everything to veganism? I was in another thread and it was compared to genocide, rape, and climate change all in the same thread. Insanity

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

probably because the animal death industry is comparable to those things

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Death Industry sounds like it would be an awesome band name.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not, you're just personally insulted. The livestock industry is responsible for about 15% of human caused greenhouse gas emissions. That's not negligible.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 16 hours ago

you're just personally insulted.

I swear to God this attitude is why people don't like what you're saying. I am all for weighing the two against each other but the "I am more moral than thou" is why I left the church.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So, I can't complain about any part of the remaining 85% if I'm not vegan? That's so fucking stupid. Do you not complain about microplastics because you're guilty of using devices with plastic in them to type your message?

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I'm a piece of shit for using a phone made by a capitalist corporation and contributes to harming the planet. I don't deny that I live in a horrible society that forces me to be a bad human just to survive.

I also don't call people stupid for telling me my device is bad for the environment. I still eat meat, I'm not a vegan, but I understand and completely agree that it's terrible for the environment. By recognizing it, I can be conscious of my consumption and reduce it.

I also use LLMs conservatively, I use them where they add value and I don't use them frivolously to generate shitty AI slop.

I'm conscious of its dangers and that drives my consumption of it.

But I don't pick and choose. I don't eat animal products three meals a day and bitch about someone using an LLM to edit a file instead of manually working on it for five hours.

Just be consistent is the message they were communicating, not that you shouldn't complain about 85%.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Same, I'm very aware that my selfish actions cause harm to the environment and I do try to be conservative about meat, electricity, and water usage. I don't even own a car.

But "I swear to God, if you aren't vegan," which is what OP said, is hardly the same as "keep it consistent." It feels like they're telling us both that our efforts are pointless because we aren't vegan. They could have said, try cutting meat from your diet to help more, or give veganism a thought. It comes off as insufferably arrogant, you know?

I'll end my rant now, haha. Sorry.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

They were trying to be funny, don't be too literal.

I think (that's how I interrupted it, I don't know) the intent was to reflect the insufferably arrogant tone of most people who exclusively complain about AI as if it has no benefits and will be the sole destroyer of our society.

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 0 points 23 hours ago

Imagining complaining about someone tipping out fresh water, while eating a burger when a single kilo of beef uses between 15,000 to 200,000 liters.

Like, until you stop doing the worst thing a single consumer can do to the planet for literally nothing but greed and pleasure (eating meat instead of healthier alternatives), you have no leg to criticize.

load more comments (23 replies)