this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
1094 points (98.7% liked)
Technology
75682 readers
3207 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No duh, says a layman who never wrote code in his life.
And many between "seniour developers everywhere" and "a layman who never wrote code in his life".
Like me, I'm saying it too. A big ol "No duh".
Disbelieve the hype.
Heh. That's a fun chart. If that's programming aptitude, I scored 80 on that part of the broad spectrum aptitude test I got a sneak-peek chance to do several parts of. Well now I know why I'm so easily in agreement with "senior coders", if it is programming aptitude quotient. If it's just iq, ... pulls hood up to block the glare.
Daunting that there may be a middling bias getting apparent advantages. Evolution may not serve us well like that.
Thing is both statements can be true.
Used appropriately and in the right context, LLMs can accelerate some select work.
But the hype level is 'human replacement is here (or imminent, depending on if the company thinks the audience is willing to believe yet or not)'. Recently Anthropic suggested someone could just type 'make a slack clone' and it'll all be done and perfect.
This. Like with any tool you have to learn how and when to use it. I've started to get the hang of what tasks it improves but I don't think I've regained the hours I've spent learning it yet.
But as the tool and my understanding of it improves it'll probably happen some day.
Oddly enough, my grasp of coding is probably the same as the guy in the middle but I still know that LLM generated code is garbage.
That's kinda wrong though. I've seen llm's write pretty good code, in some cases even doing something clever I hadn't thought of.
You should treat it as any junior though, and read the code changes and give feedback if needed.
All the best garbage to learn from, to debug, debug, debug, sharpening those skills.
Yeah, I actually considered putting the same text on all 3, but we gotta put the idiots that think it's great somewhere! Maybe I should have put it with the dumbest guy instead.
I guess I'm one of the idiots then, but what do I know. I've only been coding since the 90s
Think this one needs a bimodal curve with the two peaks representing the "caught up in the hype" average coder and the realistic average coder.
Agreed, that's why it didn't feel quite right when I made it.
Yeah, there’s definitely morons out there who never bothered to even read about the theory of good code design.